Integrated care: mobilising professional identity

Purpose: Integrated care has been identified as essential to delivering the reforms required in health and social care across the UK and other healthcare systems. Given this suggests new ways of working for health and social care professionals, little research has considered how different profession...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Best, S. (Author), Williams, S. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. 2018
Subjects:
UK
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03231nam a2200553Ia 4500
001 10.1108-JHOM-01-2018-0008
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14777266 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Integrated care: mobilising professional identity 
260 0 |b Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-01-2018-0008 
520 3 |a Purpose: Integrated care has been identified as essential to delivering the reforms required in health and social care across the UK and other healthcare systems. Given this suggests new ways of working for health and social care professionals, little research has considered how different professions manage and mobilise their professional identity (PI) whilst working in an integrated team. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative cross-sectional study was designed using eight focus groups with community-based health and social care practitioners from across Wales in the UK during 2017. Findings: Participants reported key factors influencing practice were communication, goal congruence and training. The key characteristics of PI for that enabled integrated working were open mindedness, professional trust, scope of practice and uniqueness. Blurring of boundaries was found to enable and hinder integrated working. Research limitations/implications: This research was conducted in the UK which limits the geographic coverage of the study. Nevertheless, the insight provided on PI and integrated teams is relevant to other healthcare systems. Practical implications: This study codifies for health and social care practitioners the enabling and inhibiting factors that influence PI when working in integrated teams. Originality/value: Recommendations in terms of how healthcare professionals manage and mobilise their PI when working in integrated teams are somewhat scarce. This paper identifies the key factors that influence PI which could impact the performance of integrated teams and ultimately, patient care. © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited. 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a Cross-Sectional Studies 
650 0 4 |a cross-sectional study 
650 0 4 |a Delivery of Health Care, Integrated 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Focus Groups 
650 0 4 |a Health care 
650 0 4 |a health care system 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a identity 
650 0 4 |a information processing 
650 0 4 |a integrated health care system 
650 0 4 |a Integration 
650 0 4 |a Interprofessional Relations 
650 0 4 |a leadership 
650 0 4 |a Leadership 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a patient care 
650 0 4 |a Patient Care Team 
650 0 4 |a physician 
650 0 4 |a Professional identity 
650 0 4 |a public relations 
650 0 4 |a scope of practice 
650 0 4 |a social behavior 
650 0 4 |a social care 
650 0 4 |a Social care 
650 0 4 |a Social Identification 
650 0 4 |a Teams 
650 0 4 |a trust 
650 0 4 |a UK 
650 0 4 |a United Kingdom 
650 0 4 |a Wales 
700 1 |a Best, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Williams, S.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Health Organization and Management