Using Gossips to Spread Information: Theory and Evidence from Two Randomized Controlled Trials

Can we identify highly central individuals in a network without collecting network data, simply by asking community members? Can seeding information via such nominated individuals lead to significantly wider diffusion than via randomly chosen people, or even respected ones? In two separate large fie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Banerjee, A. (Author), Chandrasekhar, A.G (Author), Duflo, E. (Author), Jackson, M.O (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2019
Subjects:
D13
D85
L14
O12
Z13
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02313nam a2200397Ia 4500
001 10.1093-restud-rdz008
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00346527 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Using Gossips to Spread Information: Theory and Evidence from Two Randomized Controlled Trials 
260 0 |b Oxford University Press  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz008 
520 3 |a Can we identify highly central individuals in a network without collecting network data, simply by asking community members? Can seeding information via such nominated individuals lead to significantly wider diffusion than via randomly chosen people, or even respected ones? In two separate large field experiments in India, we answer both questions in the affirmative. In particular, in 521 villages in Haryana, we provided information on monthly immunization camps to either randomly selected individuals (in some villages) or to individuals nominated by villagers as people who would be good at transmitting information (in other villages). We find that the number of children vaccinated every month is 22% higher in villages in which nominees received the information. We show that people's knowledge of who are highly central individuals and good seeds can be explained by a model in which community members simply track how often they hear gossip about others. Indeed, we find in a third data set that nominated seeds are central in a network sense, and are not just those with many friends or in powerful positions. © 2019 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Review of Economic Studies Limited. 
650 0 4 |a Centrality 
650 0 4 |a D13 
650 0 4 |a D85 
650 0 4 |a data set 
650 0 4 |a Diffusion 
650 0 4 |a experimental study 
650 0 4 |a Gossip 
650 0 4 |a Haryana 
650 0 4 |a India 
650 0 4 |a Influence 
650 0 4 |a information 
650 0 4 |a L14 
650 0 4 |a Networks 
650 0 4 |a O12 
650 0 4 |a Social learning 
650 0 4 |a social network 
650 0 4 |a vaccination 
650 0 4 |a village 
650 0 4 |a Z13 
700 1 |a Banerjee, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Chandrasekhar, A.G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Duflo, E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Jackson, M.O.  |e author 
773 |t Review of Economic Studies