|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03712nam a2200649Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1093-mnras-stac1115 |
008 |
220706s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 00358711 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Reconciling the results of the z ∼2 MOSDEF and KBSS-MOSFIRE Surveys
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Oxford University Press
|c 2022
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1115
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a The combination of the MOSDEF and KBSS-MOSFIRE surveys represents the largest joint investment of Keck/MOSFIRE time to date, with ∼3000 galaxies at 1.4 z 3.8, roughly half of which are at z ∼2. MOSDEF is photometric- and spectroscopic-redshift selected with a rest-optical magnitude limit, while KBSS-MOSFIRE is primarily selected based on rest-UV colours and a rest-UV magnitude limit. Analysing both surveys in a uniform manner with consistent spectral-energy- distribution (SED) models, we find that the MOSDEF z ∼2 targeted sample has higher median M ∗and redder rest U −V colour than the KBSS-MOSFIRE z ∼2 targeted sample, and smaller median SED-based SFR and sSFR (SFR(SED) and sSFR(SED)). Specifically, MOSDEF tar geted a larger population of red galaxies with U −V and V −J >1.25, while KBSS-MOSFIRE contains more young galaxies with intense star formation. Despite these differences in the z ∼2 targeted samples, the subsets of the surveys with multiple emission lines detected and analysed in previous work are much more similar. All median host-galaxy properties with the exception of stellar population age -i.e. M ∗, SFR(SED), sSFR(SED), A V , and UVJ colours -agree within the uncertainties. Additionally, when uniform emission-line fitting and stellar Balmer absorption correction techniques are applied, there is no significant offset between both samples in the [O III ] λ5008/H βversus [N II ] λ6585/H αdiagnostic diagram, in contrast to previously reported discrepancies. We can now combine the MOSDEF and KBSS-MOSFIRE surv e ys to form the largest z ∼2 sample with moderate-resolution rest-optical spectra and construct the fundamental scaling relations of star-forming galaxies during this important epoch. © 2022 The Author(s)
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cosmology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Electromagnetic wave emission
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Emission lines
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Galaxies
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a galaxies: evolution
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a galaxies: high-redshift
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a galaxies: ISM
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Galaxies: ISM
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Galaxies:high-redshift
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Galaxy evolution
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Investments
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Joint investments
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a MOSFIRE
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Optical-
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Photometrics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Red shift
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Red Shift
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Spectral energy distribution
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Stars
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Surveys
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Azadi, M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Barro, G.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Coil, A.L.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a De Groot, L.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Fetherolf, T.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Fornasini, F.M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Freeman, W.R.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kriek, M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Leung, G.C.K.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Mobasher, B.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Pettini, M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Price, S.H.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Reddy, N.A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Rudie, G.C.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Runco, J.N.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Sanders, R.L.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Shapley, A.E.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Shivaei, I.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Siana, B.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Steidel, C.C.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Strom, A.L.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Topping, M.W.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Trainor, R.F.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Zick, T.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
|