|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01986nam a2200229Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1093-imammb-dqab013 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 14778599 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Synchronization in epidemic growth and the impossibility of selective containment
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Oxford University Press
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb/dqab013
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Containment, aiming to prevent the epidemic stage of community-spreading altogether, and mitigation, aiming to merely 'flatten the curve' of a wide-ranged outbreak, constitute two qualitatively different approaches to combating an epidemic through non-pharmaceutical interventions. Here, we study a simple model of epidemic dynamics separating the population into two groups, namely a low-risk group and a high-risk group, for which different strategies are pursued. Due to synchronization effects, we find that maintaining a slower epidemic growth behaviour for the high-risk group is unstable against any finite coupling between the two groups. More precisely, the density of infected individuals in the two groups qualitatively evolves very similarly, apart from a small time delay and an overall scaling factor quantifying the coupling between the groups. Hence, selective containment of the epidemic in a targeted (high-risk) group is practically impossible whenever the surrounding society implements a mitigated community-spreading. We relate our general findings to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. © 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Epidemic dynamics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Epidemiology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Growth behavior
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Non-pharmaceutical interventions
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Risk groups
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Scaling factors
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Simple modeling
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Bergholtz, E.J.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Budich, J.C.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Mathematical Medicine and Biology
|