Historical inductions meet the material theory
Historical inductions, that is, the pessimistic metainduction and the problem of unconceived alternatives, are critically analyzed via John D. Norton’s material theory of induction and subsequently rejected as noncogent arguments. It is suggested that the material theory is amenable to a local versi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Chicago Press
2019
|
| Online Access: | View Fulltext in Publisher |
| LEADER | 00877nam a2200133Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 10.1086-705524 | ||
| 008 | 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d | ||
| 020 | |a 00318248 (ISSN) | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Historical inductions meet the material theory |
| 260 | 0 | |b University of Chicago Press |c 2019 | |
| 856 | |z View Fulltext in Publisher |u https://doi.org/10.1086/705524 | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Historical inductions, that is, the pessimistic metainduction and the problem of unconceived alternatives, are critically analyzed via John D. Norton’s material theory of induction and subsequently rejected as noncogent arguments. It is suggested that the material theory is amenable to a local version of the pessimistic metainduction, for example, in the context of some medical studies. © 2019 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shech, E. |e author | |
| 773 | |t Philosophy of Science | ||