|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01191nam a2200133Ia 4500 |
| 001 |
10.1086-705452 |
| 008 |
220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 00318248 (ISSN)
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Speech act theory and the multiple aims of science
|
| 260 |
|
0 |
|b University of Chicago Press
|c 2019
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1086/705452
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a I draw on speech act theory to understand the speech acts appropriate to the multiple aims of scientific practice and the role of nonepistemic values in evaluating speech acts made relative to those aims. First, I consider work that distinguishes explanatory speech acts from descriptive speech acts within scientific practice. I then show how speech act theory provides a framework to make sense of explaining’s and describing’s distinct felicity conditions. Finally, I argue that if explaining aims to convey understanding to particular audiences rather than describe literally across contexts, then evaluating explanatory speech acts directed to nonscientists involves nonepistemic criteria. © 2019 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Franco, P.L.
|e author
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Philosophy of Science
|
