Movement characteristics, physiological and perceptual responses of elite standard youth football players to different high intensity running drills

Purpose: To examine responses to high intensity running drills in youth football players. Methods: Seventeen players completed the YoYo Intermittent Recovery test level one (YYIR1) and a 15 m maximal sprint to quantify target running speeds. Players performed three conditions on separate occasions c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gibson, N.V (Author), Henning, G. (Author), Twist, C. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02480nam a2200205Ia 4500
001 10.1080-24733938.2018.1461235
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 24733938 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Movement characteristics, physiological and perceptual responses of elite standard youth football players to different high intensity running drills 
260 0 |b Taylor and Francis Ltd.  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2018.1461235 
520 3 |a Purpose: To examine responses to high intensity running drills in youth football players. Methods: Seventeen players completed the YoYo Intermittent Recovery test level one (YYIR1) and a 15 m maximal sprint to quantify target running speeds. Players performed three conditions on separate occasions comprising: 12 × 15 s high intensity runs at 100% of the final YYIRT1 speed, 12 × ~ 4 s repeated sprints with ~26 s recovery, and combination running using both modalities. Heart rate was monitored continuously with PlayerLoadTM and movement characteristics using microtechnology. Ratings of perceived exertion and blood lactate responses were measured 2 min after the final repetition. The ratio of Flight:contraction time was calculated from a countermovement jump before and at 2 min and 14 h after each condition. Data analysis used magnitude based inferences and effect sizes statistics. Results: Peak speed (1.1%; ES 0.23 ± 0.44) and mean speed over the initial 4 s (6.3%; ES 0.45 ± 0.46) were possibly faster during combination compared to high intensity running with unclear differences compared to repeated sprinting. This was despite most likely (21.6%; ES 7.65 ± 1.02) differences in prescribed speeds between conditions. There were likely reductions in F:C at 14 h ratio after high intensity (−5.6%; ES–0.44 ± 0.32) and combination running (−6.8%; ES −0.53 ± 0.47). Changes in the repeated sprinting condition were unclear. Conclusions: Actual movement characteristics of high intensity running drills may not reflect those used to prescribe them whilst reductions in F:C ratio are evident 14 h after their completion. © 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 
650 0 4 |a acute responses 
650 0 4 |a Football 
650 0 4 |a interval training 
650 0 4 |a youth 
700 1 |a Gibson, N.V.  |e author 
700 1 |a Henning, G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Twist, C.  |e author 
773 |t Science and Medicine in Football