Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery of Nanosilica Modified Asphalt Binder

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of nanosilica (NS) concentration on the rutting parameter of based asphalt binder using the multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) test. NS with concentrations between 1% to 5% (1% increment) was used to modify asphalt binder. The nanosil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Halim, A.G (Author), Adnan M.S (Author), Arshad, A.K (Author), Karim, M.R (Author), Lee Y.Y (Author), Lim A.J.M.S (Author), Masri, K.A (Author), Othman M.H (Author), Rahmat S.N (Author), Samsudin, M.S (Author), Zainorizuan M.J (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
View in Scopus
LEADER 02452nas a2200421Ia 4500
001 10.1051-matecconf-201710309005
008 220120c20179999CNT?? ? 0 0und d
020 |a 2261236X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery of Nanosilica Modified Asphalt Binder 
260 0 |b EDP Sciences  |c 2017 
520 3 |a The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of nanosilica (NS) concentration on the rutting parameter of based asphalt binder using the multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) test. NS with concentrations between 1% to 5% (1% increment) was used to modify asphalt binder. The nanosilica modified asphalt binder (NSMB) were aged using rolling thin film oven (RTFO) before tested. MSCR test was conducted at 64°C with two stress level (100 Pa and 3200 Pa). The results found that the addition of NS reduced the accumulative strain of NSMB. Besides that, non-recoverable creep compliance decreased and recovery strain increased, which indicates an improvement of rutting resistance and elasticity of the binder, respectively. The grade of asphalt binder also improved from heavy (H) grade to extreme (E) grade. Overall, NSMB 2% show the best improvement in terms of Jnr and %R, thus NSMB 2% considered as a optimum percentage. © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017. 
650 0 4 |a Asphalt 
650 0 4 |a Binders 
650 0 4 |a Bins 
650 0 4 |a Creep 
650 0 4 |a Creep compliance 
650 0 4 |a Environmental engineering 
650 0 4 |a Modified asphalt binders 
650 0 4 |a Multiple stress creep and recovery 
650 0 4 |a Multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) 
650 0 4 |a Recovery 
650 0 4 |a Recovery strain 
650 0 4 |a Rolling thin film ovens 
650 0 4 |a Rutting parameters 
650 0 4 |a Rutting resistance 
700 1 0 |a Abdul Halim, A.G.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Adnan M.S.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Arshad, A.K.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Karim, M.R.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lee Y.Y.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lim A.J.M.S.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Masri, K.A.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Othman M.H.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rahmat S.N.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Samsudin, M.S.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zainorizuan M.J.  |e author 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710309005 
856 |z View in Scopus  |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85018607103&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f201710309005&partnerID=40&md5=4363709729185bd2b7c91a54dfc0d743