Effects of early acoustic hearing on speech perception and language for pediatric cochlear implant recipients

Purpose: The overall goal of the current study was to identify an optimal level and duration of acoustic experience that facilitates language development for pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients-specifically, to determine whether there is an optimal duration of hearing aid (HA) use and unaided...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davidson, L.S (Author), Firszt, J.B (Author), Geers, A.E (Author), Uchanski, R.M (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03654nam a2200517Ia 4500
001 10.1044-2019_JSLHR-H-18-0255
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 10924388 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Effects of early acoustic hearing on speech perception and language for pediatric cochlear implant recipients 
260 0 |b American Speech-Language-Hearing Association  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0255 
520 3 |a Purpose: The overall goal of the current study was to identify an optimal level and duration of acoustic experience that facilitates language development for pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients-specifically, to determine whether there is an optimal duration of hearing aid (HA) use and unaided threshold levels that should be considered before proceeding to bilateral CIs. Method: A total of 117 pediatric CI recipients (ages 5-9 years) were given speech perception and standardized tests of receptive vocabulary and language. The speech perception battery included tests of segmental perception (e.g., word recognition in quiet and noise, and vowels and consonants in quiet) and of suprasegmental perception (e.g., talker and stress discrimination, and emotion identification). Hierarchical regression analyses were used to determine the effects of speech perception on language scores, and the effects of residual hearing level (unaided puretone average [PTA]) and duration of HA use on speech perception. Results: A continuum of residual hearing levels and the length of HA use were represented by calculating the unaided PTA of the ear with the longest duration of HA use for each child. All children wore 2 devices: Some wore bimodal devices, while others received their 2nd CI either simultaneously or sequentially, representing a wide range of HA use (0.03- 9.05 years). Regression analyses indicate that suprasegmental perception contributes unique variance to receptive language scores and that both segmental and suprasegmental skills each contribute independently to receptive vocabulary scores. Also, analyses revealed an optimal duration of HA use for each of 3 ranges of hearing loss severity (with mean PTAs of 73, 92, and 111 dB HL) that maximizes suprasegmental perception. Conclusions: For children with the most profound losses, early bilateral CIs provide the greatest opportunity for developing good spoken language skills. For those with moderate-tosevere losses, however, a prescribed period of bimodal use may be more advantageous for developing good spoken language skills. © 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 
650 0 4 |a acoustics 
650 0 4 |a Acoustics 
650 0 4 |a auditory threshold 
650 0 4 |a Auditory Threshold 
650 0 4 |a child 
650 0 4 |a Child 
650 0 4 |a Child Language 
650 0 4 |a Child, Preschool 
650 0 4 |a cochlea prosthesis 
650 0 4 |a Cochlear Implants 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a hearing 
650 0 4 |a Hearing 
650 0 4 |a hearing aid 
650 0 4 |a Hearing Aids 
650 0 4 |a hearing impairment 
650 0 4 |a Hearing Loss 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a language development 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a pathophysiology 
650 0 4 |a preschool child 
650 0 4 |a speech perception 
650 0 4 |a Speech Perception 
650 0 4 |a time factor 
650 0 4 |a Time Factors 
700 1 |a Davidson, L.S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Firszt, J.B.  |e author 
700 1 |a Geers, A.E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Uchanski, R.M.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research