Understanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence

• Main Authors: Cadario, R. (Author), Longoni, C. (Author), Morewedge, C.K (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Nature Research 2021
• Subjects: adult; Adult; algorithm; Algorithms; artificial intelligence; Artificial Intelligence; clinical decision making; Clinical Decision-Making; controlled study; Delivery of Health Care; female; Female; health care delivery; human; Humans; male; Male; middle aged; Middle Aged; randomized controlled trial
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Medical artificial intelligence is cost-effective and scalable and often outperforms human providers, yet people are reluctant to use it. We show that resistance to the utilization of medical artificial intelligence is driven by both the subjective difficulty of understanding algorithms (the perception that they are a ‘black box’) and by an illusory subjective understanding of human medical decision-making. In five pre-registered experiments (1–3B: N = 2,699), we find that people exhibit an illusory understanding of human medical decision-making (study 1). This leads people to believe they better understand decisions made by human than algorithmic healthcare providers (studies 2A,B), which makes them more reluctant to utilize algorithmic than human providers (studies 3A,B). Fortunately, brief interventions that increase subjective understanding of algorithmic decision processes increase willingness to utilize algorithmic healthcare providers (studies 3A,B). A sixth study on Google Ads for an algorithmic skin cancer detection app finds that the effectiveness of such interventions generalizes to field settings (study 4: N = 14,013). © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.