Reward Encourages Reactive, Goal-Directed Suppression of Attention

Stimuli that signal large reward have an increased likelihood of capturing attention and gaze relative to stimuli that signal small or no reward, even when capture counterproductively prevents reward delivery. These findings suggest that a stimulus’s signaling relationship with reward (the contingen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pearson, D. (Author), Pelley, M.E.L (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Psychological Association 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02527nam a2200313Ia 4500
001 10.1037-xhp0000946
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00961523 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Reward Encourages Reactive, Goal-Directed Suppression of Attention 
260 0 |b American Psychological Association  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000946 
520 3 |a Stimuli that signal large reward have an increased likelihood of capturing attention and gaze relative to stimuli that signal small or no reward, even when capture counterproductively prevents reward delivery. These findings suggest that a stimulus’s signaling relationship with reward (the contingency between stimulus presentation and reward delivery) is a potent influence on selective attention. Recent studies have also implicated a stimulus’s response relationship with reward (the contingency between orienting to a stimulus and reward delivery) in reducing capture by signals of reward. Here we show that this response pathway modulates capture by encouraging a reactive, goal-directed distractor suppression process. In a rewarded visual search task, participants demonstrated an oculomotor preference away from a distractor that had a negative response relationship with high reward (looking at the distractor caused reward omission) and toward a distractor that had no such negative response relationship, providing evidence for the role of the response relationship in suppressing capture by reward-related distractors. Analysis of the temporal dynamics of eye movements suggests that this distractor suppression process operates via a reactive mechanism of rapid disengagement (Experiment 1). Consistent with a goaldirected mechanism, the influence of the response relationship was eliminated when reward was unavailable (Experiment 2). These findings highlight the multifaceted role of stimulus–reward relationships in attentional selection © 2021 American Psychological Association 
650 0 4 |a attention 
650 0 4 |a Attention 
650 0 4 |a attentional capture 
650 0 4 |a distractor suppression 
650 0 4 |a Goals 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a motivation 
650 0 4 |a Motivation 
650 0 4 |a reaction time 
650 0 4 |a Reaction Time 
650 0 4 |a reward 
650 0 4 |a Reward 
650 0 4 |a reward learning 
700 1 |a Pearson, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Pelley, M.E.L.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance