The temporal dynamics of opportunity costs: A normative account of cognitive fatigue and boredom

Cognitive fatigue and boredom are two phenomenological states that reflect overt task disengagement. In this article, we present a rational analysis of the temporal structure of controlled behavior, which provides a formal account of these phenomena. We suggest that in controlling behavior, the brai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agrawal, M. (Author), Cohen, J.D (Author), Daw, N.D (Author), Mattar, M.G (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NLM (Medline) 2022
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 01938nam a2200169Ia 4500
001 10.1037-rev0000309
008 220630s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 19391471 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The temporal dynamics of opportunity costs: A normative account of cognitive fatigue and boredom 
260 0 |b NLM (Medline)  |c 2022 
520 3 |a Cognitive fatigue and boredom are two phenomenological states that reflect overt task disengagement. In this article, we present a rational analysis of the temporal structure of controlled behavior, which provides a formal account of these phenomena. We suggest that in controlling behavior, the brain faces competing behavioral and computational imperatives, and must balance them by tracking their opportunity costs over time. We use this analysis to flesh out previous suggestions that feelings associated with subjective effort, like cognitive fatigue and boredom, are the phenomenological counterparts of these opportunity cost measures, instead of reflecting the depletion of resources as has often been assumed. Specifically, we propose that both fatigue and boredom reflect the competing value of particular options that require foregoing immediate reward but can improve future performance: Fatigue reflects the value of offline computation (internal to the organism) to improve future decisions, while boredom signals the value of exploration (external in the world). We demonstrate that these accounts provide a mechanistically explicit and parsimonious account for a wide array of findings related to cognitive control, integrating and reimagining them under a single, formally rigorous framework. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved). 
700 1 0 |a Agrawal, M.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cohen, J.D.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Daw, N.D.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mattar, M.G.  |e author 
773 |t Psychological review 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000309