Representation and misrepresentation of knowledge

I argue for three points: First, evidence of the primacy of knowledge representation is not evidence of primacy of knowledge. Second, knowledge-oriented mindreading research should also focus on misrepresentations and biased representations of knowledge. Third, knowledge-oriented mindreading researc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gerken, M. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 01024nam a2200157Ia 4500
001 10.1017-S0140525X20001570
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 0140525X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Representation and misrepresentation of knowledge 
260 0 |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001570 
520 3 |a I argue for three points: First, evidence of the primacy of knowledge representation is not evidence of primacy of knowledge. Second, knowledge-oriented mindreading research should also focus on misrepresentations and biased representations of knowledge. Third, knowledge-oriented mindreading research must confront the problem of the gold standard that arises when disagreement about knowledge complicates the interpretation of empirical findings. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press. 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a gold standard 
700 1 |a Gerken, M.  |e author 
773 |t Behavioral and Brain Sciences