The explanatory link account of normality

Few have given an extended treatment of the non-statistical sense of normality: a sense captured in sentences like “dogs have four legs,” or “hammers normally have metal heads,” or “it is normal for badgers to take dust baths.” The most direct extant treatment is Bernhard Nickel's Between Logic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lavin, A. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2019
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 01234nam a2200133Ia 4500
001 10.1017-S0031819119000317
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00318191 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The explanatory link account of normality 
260 0 |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819119000317 
520 3 |a Few have given an extended treatment of the non-statistical sense of normality: a sense captured in sentences like “dogs have four legs,” or “hammers normally have metal heads,” or “it is normal for badgers to take dust baths.” The most direct extant treatment is Bernhard Nickel's Between Logic and the World, where he claims that the normal or characteristic for a kind is what we can explain by appeal to the right sorts of explanations. Just which explanatory strategies can ground normalities, though, is difficult to determine without inviting circularity into the account. After raising this and other worries for Nickel's account, I develop my own account according to which normal features are those which are explained by the kind of thing involved. © The Royal Institute of Philosophy, 2019 
700 1 |a Lavin, A.  |e author 
773 |t Philosophy