Enhancing Lateral Contrast Using Multi-perspective Ultrasound Imaging of Abdominal Aortas

Vascular ultrasound imaging is inherently hampered by low lateral resolution and contrast. Steering of the ultrasound beams can be used to overcome these limitations in superficial artery imaging because the aperture-to-depth ratio is relatively high. However, in arteries located at larger depths, t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lopata, R.G.P (Author), Petterson, N.J (Author), van de Vosse, F.N (Author), van Sambeek, M.R.H.M (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03007nam a2200673Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.023
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 03015629 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Enhancing Lateral Contrast Using Multi-perspective Ultrasound Imaging of Abdominal Aortas 
260 0 |b Elsevier Inc.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.023 
520 3 |a Vascular ultrasound imaging is inherently hampered by low lateral resolution and contrast. Steering of the ultrasound beams can be used to overcome these limitations in superficial artery imaging because the aperture-to-depth ratio is relatively high. However, in arteries located at larger depths, the steered beams do not overlap for larger steering angles. In this study, the ultrasound probe is physically translated over the abdomen to create large angles between acquisitions, while maintaining overlap on the abdominal aorta. In one phantom setup and 11 volunteers, 2-D cross-sectional multi-perspective ultrasound images of the abdominal aorta were acquired using seven angles between –45° and +45°. Automatic registration of the recorded images was performed by automatic feature detection of the aorta and spine. This automatic detection was successful in 62 out of 77 image sets. Compounded multi-perspective images showed an increase of contrast-to-noise ratios from 0.6 ± 0.1 to 1.2 ± 0.2 over the entire heart cycle in volunteers. © 2020 The Authors 
650 0 4 |a abdominal aorta 
650 0 4 |a abdominal aorta 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a Aorta 
650 0 4 |a Aorta, Abdominal 
650 0 4 |a aortic wall 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a Automatic Detection 
650 0 4 |a Automatic registration 
650 0 4 |a Blood vessels 
650 0 4 |a Cardiovascular 
650 0 4 |a contrast enhancement 
650 0 4 |a contrast to noise ratio 
650 0 4 |a Contrast to noise ratio 
650 0 4 |a diagnostic imaging 
650 0 4 |a echography 
650 0 4 |a echography 
650 0 4 |a feature detection 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a heart cycle 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human experiment 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a image quality 
650 0 4 |a imaging phantom 
650 0 4 |a Lateral resolution 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Multi-perspective 
650 0 4 |a Multi-perspective image 
650 0 4 |a normal human 
650 0 4 |a patient positioning 
650 0 4 |a Patient Positioning 
650 0 4 |a Phantoms, Imaging 
650 0 4 |a priority journal 
650 0 4 |a procedures 
650 0 4 |a Ultrasonic imaging 
650 0 4 |a Ultrasonography 
650 0 4 |a Ultrasound 
650 0 4 |a Ultrasound images 
650 0 4 |a Ultrasound imaging 
650 0 4 |a Vascular ultrasound 
700 1 |a Lopata, R.G.P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Petterson, N.J.  |e author 
700 1 |a van de Vosse, F.N.  |e author 
700 1 |a van Sambeek, M.R.H.M.  |e author 
773 |t Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology