Comparison of different methods of spatial disaggregation of electricity generation and consumption time series

Energy system models involve various input data sets representing the generation, consumption and transport infrastructure of electricity. Especially energy system models with a focus on the transmission grid require time series of electricity feed-in and consumption in a high spatial resolution. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruckmeier, A. (Author), Dengiz, T. (Author), Finck, R. (Author), Medjroubi, W. (Author), Raventós, O. (Author), Unaichi, C. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02598nam a2200313Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.rser.2022.112186
008 220517s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 13640321 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Comparison of different methods of spatial disaggregation of electricity generation and consumption time series 
260 0 |b Elsevier Ltd  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112186 
520 3 |a Energy system models involve various input data sets representing the generation, consumption and transport infrastructure of electricity. Especially energy system models with a focus on the transmission grid require time series of electricity feed-in and consumption in a high spatial resolution. In general, there are two approaches to obtain regionalized time series: top-down and bottom-up. In many cases, both methodologies may be combined to aggregate or disaggregate input data. Furthermore, there exist various approaches to assign regionalized feed-in of renewable energy sources and electrical load to the model's grid connection points. The variety in the regionalization process leads to significant differences on a regional scope, even if global values are the same. We develop a Methodology to compare regionalization techniques of input data for photovoltaics, wind and electrical load between various models as well as data assignment techniques to the power grid nodes. We further define two invariants to evaluate the outcome of the regionalization process at the NUTS 3 level, one invariant for the annual profiles and one for the installed capacities. This Methodology enabled us to compare different regionalization and assignment workflows using simple parameters, without explicit knowledge of grid topology. Our results show that the resolution of the input data and the use of a top-down or a bottom-up approach are the most determinant factors in the regionalization process. © 2022 The Author(s) 
650 0 4 |a (Dis)aggregation techniques 
650 0 4 |a Aggregation techniques comparison 
650 0 4 |a Electricity consumption 
650 0 4 |a Electricity generation 
650 0 4 |a Energy systems 
650 0 4 |a Load time series 
650 0 4 |a Model comparison 
650 0 4 |a Power system models 
650 0 4 |a Regionalization 
650 0 4 |a Spatial (dis)aggregation 
700 1 |a Bruckmeier, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Dengiz, T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Finck, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Medjroubi, W.  |e author 
700 1 |a Raventós, O.  |e author 
700 1 |a Unaichi, C.  |e author 
773 |t Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews