|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01849nam a2200277Ia 4500 |
| 001 |
10.1016-j.respol.2019.01.010 |
| 008 |
220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 00487333 (ISSN)
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Governing with ambivalence: The tentative origins of socio-technical integration
|
| 260 |
|
0 |
|b Elsevier B.V.
|c 2019
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.010
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a Requirements to integrate societal considerations into research and development practices began appearing throughout the democratic industrialized world in the early 2000s and eventually became a central feature of responsible innovation. Examining one of the earliest and most prominent policy examples, this paper investigates the conceptual basis of the U.S. nanotechnology program's mandate for socio-technical integration. It argues that policy makers adopted this innovative response to addressing the societal issues of an emerging technology due to their heightened awareness of potential interactions among public attitudes, research directions, and technological trajectories. Integration thus emerged as a governance mechanism for mediating the interaction between these dynamic sources of uncertainty. The mandate emerged in a self-consciously experimental and anticipatory manner and thus provides a practical instance of tentative governance. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Ambivalence
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Anticipation
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Emerging technologies
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Governance
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Governance mechanisms
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Integration
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Nanotechnology
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Research and development
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Responsible innovation
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Sociotechnical
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Socio-technical integration
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Sources of uncertainty
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Fisher, E.
|e author
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Research Policy
|
