Computational fluid dynamics analysis and experimental hemolytic performance of three clinical centrifugal blood pumps: Revolution, Rotaflow and CentriMag

• Main Authors: Griffith, B.P (Author), Han, D. (Author), Han, L. (Author), He, G. (Author), Leibowitz, J.L (Author), Wang, S. (Author), Wu, Z.J (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V. 2022
• Subjects: Centrifugal blood pumps; CFD; ECMO support; Hemolysis
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Centrifugal blood pumps have become popular for adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to their superior blood handling and reduced thrombosis risk featured by their secondary flow paths that avoid stagnant areas. However, the high rotational speed within a centrifugal blood pump can introduce high shear stress, causing a significant shear-induced hemolysis rate. The Revolution pump, the Rotaflow pump, and the CentriMag pump are three of the leading centrifugal blood pumps on the market. Although many experimental and computational studies have focused on evaluating the hydraulic and hemolytic performances of the Rotaflow and CentriMag pumps, there are few on the Revolution pump. Furthermore, a thorough direct comparison of these three pumps' flow characteristics and hemolysis is not available. In this study, we conducted a computational and experimental analysis to compare the hemolytic performances of the Revolution, Rotaflow, and CentriMag pumps operating under a clinically relevant condition, i.e., the blood flow rate of 5 ​L/min and pump pressure head of 350 ​mmHg, for adult ECMO support. In silico simulations were used to characterize the shear stress distributions and predict the hemolysis index, while in vitro blood loop studies experimentally determined hemolysis performance. Comparative simulation results and experimental data demonstrated that the CentriMag pump caused the lowest hemolysis while the Revolution pump generated the highest hemolysis. © 2022 The Author(s)