|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03397nam a2200529Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1016-j.jpsychores.2022.110912 |
008 |
220517s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 00223999 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Body image dissatisfaction and experimental pressure pain sensitivity in a cohort of 13-year-old adolescents
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Elsevier Inc.
|c 2022
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110912
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Objective: We aimed to quantify the associations between body image (dis)satisfaction and pressure pain thresholds in adolescents, using data from Generation XXI, a population-based cohort study in Portugal. Methods: We assessed 1785 13-year old adolescents cross-sectionally. Body image satisfaction was measured using the Children's Figure Rating Scale. Pain detection and tolerance thresholds were assessed using cuff pressure algometry. We quantified the associations between body image categories (satisfied, prefers slightly thinner, prefers much thinner, and prefers heavier) and pain detection and tolerance thresholds using linear and logistic regression for continuous and binary (odds of achieving the highest distribution quarter) outcomes, respectively. Models were adjusted to pubertal stage and body mass index. Results: Adolescents who desired a heavier silhouette had lower pressure pain tolerance thresholds when compared to those who were satisfied (linear regression coefficient: −3.95; 95% confidence interval: −6.68, −1.21), which was more precise in boys (−3.51; −7.17, −0.08). Those adolescents also had lower odds of achieving the highest quarter of pressure pain tolerance threshold (odds ratio: 0.66; 0.48, 0.90), especially girls (0.58; 0.35, 0.98). Adolescents who desired much thinner silhouettes had lower odds of achieving the highest quarter of pressure pain tolerance (0.68; 0.46, 1.00), and this was clearer in girls (0.66; 0.48, 0.90). Pain detection thresholds did not show robust associations with body image dissatisfaction. Conclusion: Our study suggests an association between satisfaction with one's silhouette and pain tolerance in adolescents from the general population, arguing for an integrated approach to the assessment of body image and pain sensitivity. © 2022 The Authors
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a adolescence
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Adolescence
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a adolescent
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a algometry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a body dissatisfaction
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Body dissatisfaction
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a body image
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Body image
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a body mass
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a cohort analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a controlled study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cuff pressure algometry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a female
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a linear regression analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a male
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a nociception
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pain sensitivity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pain threshold
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Portugal
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pressure pain threshold
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a quantitative analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a quantitative sensory testing
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Quantitative sensory testing
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a rating scale
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a satisfaction
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Abelha, F.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Brandão, M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Henriques, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Lucas, R.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Vieira, B.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Warkentin, S.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Journal of Psychosomatic Research
|