|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01262nam a2200217Ia 4500 |
| 001 |
10.1016-j.jmp.2018.08.001 |
| 008 |
220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 00222496 (ISSN)
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Expected Scott–Suppes utility representation
|
| 260 |
|
0 |
|b Academic Press Inc.
|c 2018
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.08.001
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a We provide an axiomatic characterization for an expected Scott–Suppes utility representation. Such a characterization is the natural analog of the von Neumann–Morgenstern expected utility theorem for semiorders and it is noted as an open problem by Fishburn (1968). Expected Scott–Suppes utility representation is analytically tractable and can be used in applications that study preferences with intransitive indifference under uncertainty. Our representation offers a decision-theoretical interpretation for epsilon equilibrium as well. © 2018 Elsevier Inc.
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Expected utility
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Intransitive indifference
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Scott–Suppes representation
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Semiorder
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Uncertainty
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Dalkıran, N.A.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Dokumacı, O.E.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Kara, T.
|e author
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Journal of Mathematical Psychology
|
