Too good to be true? Fallacies in evaluating risk factor models
This paper is concerned with statistical inference and model evaluation in possibly misspecified and unidentified linear asset pricing models estimated by maximum likelihood. Strikingly, when spurious factors (that is, factors that are uncorrelated with the returns on the test assets) are present, t...
Main Authors: | Gospodinov, N. (Author), Kan, R. (Author), Robotti, C. (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier B.V.
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | View Fulltext in Publisher |
Similar Items
-
The Exploration of Effect of Model Misspecification and Development of an Adequacy-Test for Substitution Model in Phylogenetics
by: Chen, Wei Jr
Published: (2012) -
Proportional likelihood ratio mixed model for longitudinal discrete data
by: Wu, Hongqian
Published: (2016) -
Testing the Effectiveness of Various Commonly Used Fit Indices for Detecting Misspecifications in Multilevel Structure Equation Models
by: Hsu, Hsien-Yuan
Published: (2011) -
Identification of the Most Suitable Probability Distribution Models for Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Streamflow
by: Philip Kibet Langat, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Goodness of Fit Test of an Autocorrelated Time Series Cubic Smoothing Spline Model
by: Samuel Olorunfemi Adams, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)