One fundamental and two taxes: When does a Tobin tax reduce financial price volatility?
We aim to make two contributions to the literature on the effects of transaction costs on financial price volatility. First, by augmenting a double differencing approach with a research design with three ingredients (a common set of companies simultaneously listed on two stock exchanges, binding cap...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier B.V.
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | View Fulltext in Publisher |
LEADER | 01805nam a2200217Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 10.1016-j.jfineco.2018.04.009 | ||
008 | 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d | ||
020 | |a 0304405X (ISSN) | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a One fundamental and two taxes: When does a Tobin tax reduce financial price volatility? |
260 | 0 | |b Elsevier B.V. |c 2018 | |
856 | |z View Fulltext in Publisher |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.04.009 | ||
520 | 3 | |a We aim to make two contributions to the literature on the effects of transaction costs on financial price volatility. First, by augmenting a double differencing approach with a research design with three ingredients (a common set of companies simultaneously listed on two stock exchanges, binding capital controls, and different timing of changes in transaction costs), we obtain a control group that has identical corporate fundamentals as the treatment group. We apply the research design to Chinese stocks that are cross-listed in Hong Kong and Mainland China. Second, we allow transaction costs to have different effects in markets with different maturity. We find a significantly negative relationship, on average, between stamp duty increase and price volatility. However, this average effect masks some important heterogeneity. In particular, when institutional investors have become a significant part of the traders’ pool, we find an opposite effect. Overall, our results suggest that a Tobin tax could work in an immature market, but can backfire in a more developed market. © 2018 Elsevier B.V. | |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Limits to arbitrage |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Speculation |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Tobin tax |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Transaction cost |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Volatility |
700 | 1 | |a Deng, Y. |e author | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, X. |e author | |
700 | 1 | |a Wei, S.-J. |e author | |
773 | |t Journal of Financial Economics |