Restricting water withdrawals of the thermal power sector: An input-output analysis for the northeast of the United States

As water scarcity and pollution of sources become increasingly severe and widespread, competition over this resource intensifies. Unlike much of the rest of the world, thermal power plants in the US are the biggest users of water due to heavy reliance on once-through cooling technology. This cooling...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cazcarro, I. (Author), Dilekli, N. (Author), Duchin, F. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02886nam a2200373Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.jclepro.2018.06.218
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 09596526 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Restricting water withdrawals of the thermal power sector: An input-output analysis for the northeast of the United States 
260 0 |b Elsevier Ltd  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.218 
520 3 |a As water scarcity and pollution of sources become increasingly severe and widespread, competition over this resource intensifies. Unlike much of the rest of the world, thermal power plants in the US are the biggest users of water due to heavy reliance on once-through cooling technology. This cooling technology withdraws large amounts of water and discharges it back almost in its entirety but at higher temperatures. These water withdrawals are increasingly subjected to legislation intended to reduce the effects of thermal pollution. We utilize an interregional input-output model for quantifying the money costs and the shifts in the distribution of power production by state and by technology when withdrawals and discharges of fresh water are restricted. This model allows for the choice among alternative power generation technologies with different cost structures within each state. We analyze a Baseline scenario for 2010 and alternative scenarios that impose constraints on water withdrawals and inter-state power transmission. Based on an annual analysis, we conclude that this region can satisfy its electric power requirements while fully complying with legislated water restrictions at moderate cost by compensating the curtailment of output from some plants by otherwise unutilized capacities of other plants in the region. When we revisit the analysis using a monthly time step, however, sharp seasonal variations exhibit a strong impact on economic costs. In the summer months, intra-state transmission does not suffice, and regional demand cannot be met in the absence of substantial inter-state transmission. © 2018 
650 0 4 |a Choice of technology 
650 0 4 |a Cost benefit analysis 
650 0 4 |a Electric power requirement 
650 0 4 |a Input output analysis 
650 0 4 |a Input output model 
650 0 4 |a International trade 
650 0 4 |a Interregional input-output model 
650 0 4 |a Once-through cooling 
650 0 4 |a Scenario analysis 
650 0 4 |a Thermal pollution 
650 0 4 |a Thermal power 
650 0 4 |a Thermal power plants 
650 0 4 |a Thermal power production 
650 0 4 |a Thermoelectric power plants 
650 0 4 |a Water constraints 
650 0 4 |a Water pollution 
650 0 4 |a World trade 
650 0 4 |a World trade model 
700 1 |a Cazcarro, I.  |e author 
700 1 |a Dilekli, N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Duchin, F.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Cleaner Production