|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03297nam a2200613Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1016-j.humov.2021.102866 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 01679457 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Effect of the soft tissue artifact on marker measurements and on the calculation of the helical axis of the knee during a gait cycle: A study on the CAMS-Knee data set
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Elsevier B.V.
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102866
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a The soft tissue artifact (STA) is a phenomenon occurring when the motion of bones or anatomical segments is measured by means of skin markers: the biological tissues between the markers and the bone produce a relative motion bone-markers that leads to inaccuracies in the estimation of rigid body poses or kinematics. The aim of this study was to quantify the STA by exploiting a recently published gait analysis dataset. The dataset was composed of six adult subjects with a total knee arthroplasty who underwent gait analysis trials. The motion of the knee was concurrently recorded by means of (i) fluoroscopy imaging and (ii) an optoelectronic system and redundant markers attached to the thigh and shank. The STA was studied by comparing the results calculated on the marker sets with the results obtained from the fluoroscopy data. The stance and swing phases were considered separately. Rigid STA motion and local STA deformation were studied separately. In addition to previous studies, the instantaneous helical axis (IHA) of the knee was calculated and the effect of the STA on its calculation was assessed. The largest rigid-motion STA effect was observed on the thigh cluster (~10 deg. and ~ 18 mm). The shank cluster was mainly affected during the swing phase (~7 deg. and ~ 17 mm). The local STA deformation affected differently the markers. The largest effect was ~16 mm and the lowest was ~4 mm. The estimation of the IHA was not reliable when based only on markers, having an estimation error of ~17 deg. and ~ 25 mm. A high variability of results across subjects was observed. © 2021 The Authors
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a adult
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Adult
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a aged
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a artifact
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Artifacts
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Biomechanical Phenomena
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a biomechanics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a calculation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a clinical article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a female
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a femur
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a fluoroscopy
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Fluoroscopy
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a gait
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a gait
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Gait
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Gait analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Helical axis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a joint characteristics and functions
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a knee
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a knee function
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Knee Joint
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Knee prosthesis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a male
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a measurement
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a motion
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Motion capture
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Range of Motion, Articular
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Skin artifact
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a soft tissue
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Soft tissue artifact
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a standing
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a thigh
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a tibia
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a total knee arthroplasty
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Aertbeliën, E.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Ancillao, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a De Schutter, J.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Human Movement Science
|