|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03892nam a2200673Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1016-j.ecolind.2021.108213 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 1470160X (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Integrating regional and local monitoring data and assessment tools to evaluate habitat conditions and inform river restoration
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Elsevier B.V.
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108213
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Restoring degraded rivers requires initial assessment of the fluvial landscape to identify stressors and riverine features that can be enhanced. We associated local-scale river habitat data collected using standardized national monitoring tools with modeled regional water temperature and flow data on mid-sized northwest U.S. rivers (30–60 m wide). We grouped these rivers according to quartiles of their modeled mean August water temperature and examined their physical habitat structure and flow. We then used principal components analysis to summarize the variation in several dimensions of physical habitat. We also compared local conditions in the Priest River, a river targeted for restoration of native salmonid habitat in northern Idaho, with those in other rivers of the region to infer potential drivers controlling water temperature. The warmest rivers had physical structure and fluvial characteristics typical of thermally degraded rivers, whereas the coldest rivers had higher mean summer flows and greater channel planform complexity. The Priest River sites had approximately twice as many deep residual pools (>50, >75, and >100 cm) and incision that averaged approximately twice that in the coldest rivers. Percentage fines and natural cover in the Priest were also more typical of the higher-temperature river groups. We found generally low instream cover and low levels of large wood both across the region and within the Priest River. Our approach enabled us to consider the local habitat conditions of a river in the context of other similarly sized rivers in the surrounding region. Understanding this context is important for identifying potential influences on river water temperature within the focal basin and for defining attainable goals for management and restoration of thermal and habitat conditions. © 2021
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a accuracy assessment
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a assessment method
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Ecosystems
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Environmental monitoring and assessment programs
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a habitat structure
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Idaho
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Incision
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Incision
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Instream habitat
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a In-stream habitats
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a integrated approach
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a landscape ecology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Monitoring
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a National river and stream assessment
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a National Rivers and Streams Assessment
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Priest river
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Priest River
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Priest River
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Principal component analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Restoration
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a restoration ecology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a River assessments
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a river channel
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a river system
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a river water
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Rivers
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Rivers and streams
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a salmonid
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Salmonidae
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Salmonids
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Salmonids
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a seasonal variation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Stream assessment
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Stream flow
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Temperature
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a United States
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a water temperature
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Water temperature
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Water temperatures
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Andersen, T.K.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Berntsen, E.K.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Connor, J.M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kaufmann, P.R.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Mejia, F.H.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Torgersen, C.E.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Ecological Indicators
|