Lichen bioindicators of nitrogen and sulfur deposition in dry forests of Utah and New Mexico, USA

• Main Authors: Amacher, M. (Author), Fenn, M. (Author), Hall, J. (Author), Jovan, S. (Author), Root, H.T (Author), Shaw, J.D (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V. 2021
• Subjects: bioindicator; biomonitoring; CMAQ; concentration (composition); Cost effectiveness; Deposition; 'Dry' [; dry forest; Dry forests; Energy development; Forestry; Fungi; Ion exchange; Ion exchange resin sampler; Ion exchange resin samplers; Ion exchange resins; lichen; Lichen; Melanohalea exasperatula; Melanohalea subolivacea; N-deposition; New Mexico; nitrogen; Nitrogen; organic sulfur compound; pollution exposure; Seasonal deposition; seasonal variation; sulfur; Tdep; TDep; throughfall; Throughfall; United States; Utah; Varanidae
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition can negatively affect ecosystem functions and lichen biomonitors can be a cost-effective way to monitor air pollution exposure across the landscape. Interior dry forests of the southwestern United States face increasing development pressures; however, this region differs from others with well-developed biomonitoring programs in having drier climates and a greater fraction of deposition delivered in dry forms. We measured throughfall N and S deposition at 12 sites in Utah and 10 in New Mexico and co-located collection of 6 lichen species. Throughfall N deposition ranged from 0.76 to 6.96 kg/ha/year and S deposition from 0.57 to 1.44 kg/ha/year with elevated levels near human development that were not predicted by commonly used simulation models. Throughfall N was 4.6 and 1.6 times higher in summer compared with fall-spring in Utah and New Mexico and S deposition was 3.9 and 1.8 times higher in summer. Lichen N and S concentrations ranged from 0.97 to 2.7% and 0.09 to 0.33%. Replicate samples within plots showed high variability in N and S concentrations with within-plot coefficients of variation for N ranging between 5 and 10% and for S between 7 and 15%. In Utah, N and S concentrations in lichen species were correlated with each other in most cases, with R2 ranging from 0.52 to 0.85. N concentrations in Melanohalea exasperatula and Melanohalea subolivacea could be correlated with average annual throughfall N deposition in Utah (R2 = 0.58 and 0.31). Those relationships were improved by focusing on deposition in fall-spring prior to lichen sampling in Utah (R2 for M. exasperatula, M. subolivacea, and X. montana = 0.59, 0.42, and 0.28). In New Mexico, lichens exhibited greater coefficients of variability within plots than between plots and could not be correlated with throughfall N deposition. In neither study area was S correlated between lichens and throughfall deposition, which may be the result of low S deposition over a narrow deposition range or complex lichen assimilation of S. Lichen biomonitoring for N deposition in the region shows promise, but could potentially be improved by sampling more thalli to reduce within-plot variability, repeated lichen collection synchronized with throughfall changeouts to explore temporal variability, and washing lichen collections to distinguish N and S that has been incorporated by the thalli from dry deposition that may accumulate on lichen surfaces. © 2021 The Authors