Remote-sensing estimates of forest structure and dynamics as indicators of habitat quality for Magellanic woodpeckers

Bridging remote-sensing ecosystem indices with biodiversity conservation implies converting these indices into habitat quality indicators for species playing an important role in communities and ecosystems, such as woodpeckers. However, an ecologically reliable estimation of habitat quality necessar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alaniz, A.J (Author), Ansaldo, D. (Author), Carvajal, M.A (Author), Fierro, A. (Author), Moreira-Arce, D. (Author), Rojas-Osorio, A. (Author), Toledo, G. (Author), Vergara, P.M (Author), Vergara-Rodríguez, V. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03958nam a2200673Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.ecolind.2021.107634
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 1470160X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Remote-sensing estimates of forest structure and dynamics as indicators of habitat quality for Magellanic woodpeckers 
260 0 |b Elsevier B.V.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107634 
520 3 |a Bridging remote-sensing ecosystem indices with biodiversity conservation implies converting these indices into habitat quality indicators for species playing an important role in communities and ecosystems, such as woodpeckers. However, an ecologically reliable estimation of habitat quality necessarily involves an assessment of fitness components ultimately responsible for population persistence. Here, we assessed the relationship between remote-sensing indices of forest structure, dynamics and composition with the breeding performance of Magellanic woodpeckers in conservation areas of southern Chile. We used a Bayesian-spatial model based on age and sex information from woodpecker's social group data collected seasonally in seven years. The probability of a young remaining in the group decreased with the mean group size during the previous year, with group size fluctuating temporally in all conservation areas. Tree senescence had a positive effect on the pairing probability of woodpeckers, but this effect became more marked in sites of higher altitude. Paired woodpeckers were more likely to be observed in sites supporting more than 69% of forest cover. The probability of the young remaining in the territory was positively affected by the interaction between forest canopy continuity and altitude, with retention of the young being more likely in sites located higher than 1000 masl. Social groups were larger in sites where the continuity of canopy increased over time. Those findings suggest that remote sensing indices representing the structure and dynamics of forest ecosystems are important indicators of the habitat quality for woodpeckers. Thus, forest biodiversity that depends on the woodpecker's engineering function may be conserved through the retention of senescent trees and the maintaining of critical levels of forest cover ensuring high habitat-quality for breeding woodpeckers. © 2021 The Author(s) 
650 0 4 |a biodiversity 
650 0 4 |a Biodiversity 
650 0 4 |a bird 
650 0 4 |a Breeding success 
650 0 4 |a Breeding success 
650 0 4 |a Chile 
650 0 4 |a Conservation 
650 0 4 |a Conservation areas 
650 0 4 |a Conservation areas 
650 0 4 |a conservation planning 
650 0 4 |a conservation status 
650 0 4 |a Dynamics 
650 0 4 |a Ecosystems 
650 0 4 |a forest canopy 
650 0 4 |a forest cover 
650 0 4 |a forest dynamics 
650 0 4 |a Forest dynamics 
650 0 4 |a forest ecosystem 
650 0 4 |a Forestry 
650 0 4 |a group size 
650 0 4 |a habitat quality 
650 0 4 |a Habitat quality 
650 0 4 |a Magellanic woodpecker 
650 0 4 |a Magellanic woodpeckers 
650 0 4 |a Picidae 
650 0 4 |a Plant senescence reflectance index 
650 0 4 |a Plant senescence reflectance index 
650 0 4 |a Probability 
650 0 4 |a remote sensing 
650 0 4 |a Remote sensing 
650 0 4 |a Remote-sensing 
650 0 4 |a Satellite data 
650 0 4 |a Satellite data 
650 0 4 |a Southern chile 
650 0 4 |a Southern Chile 
650 0 4 |a Vegetation continuous fields 
650 0 4 |a Vegetation continuous fields 
700 1 |a Alaniz, A.J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Ansaldo, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Carvajal, M.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Fierro, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Moreira-Arce, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Rojas-Osorio, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Toledo, G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Vergara, P.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Vergara-Rodríguez, V.  |e author 
773 |t Ecological Indicators