How sensitive are epiphytic and epixylic cryptogams as indicators of forest naturalness? Testing bryophyte and lichen predictive power in stands under different management regimes in the Białowieża forest

The aim of this study was to test the sensitivity of epiphytic and epixylic bryophytes and lichens as indicators of forest naturalness, by comparing their diversity patterns with forest structural, compositional and historical features associated with different management/protection regimes and prot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cacciatori, C. (Author), Czerepko, J. (Author), Gawryś, R. (Author), Haidt, A. (Author), Janek, M. (Author), Kowalewska, A. (Author), Kukwa, M. (Author), Piegdoń, A. (Author), Pisarek, W. (Author), Stebel, A. (Author), Szymczyk, R. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 04879nam a2200637Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.ecolind.2021.107532
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 1470160X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a How sensitive are epiphytic and epixylic cryptogams as indicators of forest naturalness? Testing bryophyte and lichen predictive power in stands under different management regimes in the Białowieża forest 
260 0 |b Elsevier B.V.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107532 
520 3 |a The aim of this study was to test the sensitivity of epiphytic and epixylic bryophytes and lichens as indicators of forest naturalness, by comparing their diversity patterns with forest structural, compositional and historical features associated with different management/protection regimes and protection time spans. The study was carried out in the Białowieża Forest (Poland). Out of 1370 pre-existing inventory plots established all across the Polish part of the Białowieża Forest, we randomly selected 10 plots for each of the 18 plot aggregation groups resulting from the combination of 3 management/protection regimes and 6 habitat types, for an overall number of 180 plots. At each of them, we carried out bryophyte and lichen sampling on four substrates (coarse woody debris – CWD, standing dead trees, stumps, living trees). The management/protection regimes exemplifying the gradient of forest naturalness were: the 100 years-old Białowieża National Park (BNP), a set of more recently established nature reserves and managed forests. We tested differences in mean species richness values among management/protection regimes, protection time spans, habitat types and stand age classes by analysis of variance and calculated coefficients of correlation with 45 selected structural and compositional features of forest stands. Differences in species composition of epiphytic and epixilic bryophytes and lichens among management/protection regimes were tested by ordination methods. Lastly, we compared frequency of red-listed species and primeval forest relics among management/protection regimes. Species richness of lichens was significantly correlated with the degree of forest naturalness assessed by structural and historical features along the naturalness gradient, with the highest number of species recorded in BNP and the lower in managed stands, while bryophyte number did not exhibit a clear dependence on the management regimes. Relic species of primeval forests and red-listed species occurred with significantly higher frequency in protected areas than in managed forests for both lichens and bryophytes, with the highest frequency observed in BNP for lichens and in nature reserves for bryophytes. Volume of deadwood, particularly of CWD in advanced decays stage, species richness of undergrowth vascular plants, tree layer diversity, shrub cover and herb layer cover exhibited the strongest correlation with cryptogam species richness and cover on the various substrates. Response to light availability strongly differenciated bryophyte and lichens optimal niches. The results of this study clearly show that cryptogams, and lichens in particular, are indeed reliable ecological indicators of forest status, since they sensibly intercepted the environmental changes observable along the tested naturalness gradient. © 2021 The Author(s) 
650 0 4 |a Bialowieza Forest 
650 0 4 |a bryophyte 
650 0 4 |a bryophytes 
650 0 4 |a Coarse woody debris 
650 0 4 |a Compositional features 
650 0 4 |a Conservation 
650 0 4 |a dead wood 
650 0 4 |a Ecological indicators 
650 0 4 |a Ecological indicators 
650 0 4 |a Ecosystems 
650 0 4 |a Environmental change 
650 0 4 |a environmental protection 
650 0 4 |a epiphyte 
650 0 4 |a Forest management regimes 
650 0 4 |a Forest naturalness gradient 
650 0 4 |a Forestry 
650 0 4 |a frequency analysis 
650 0 4 |a Fungi 
650 0 4 |a lichen 
650 0 4 |a Light availability 
650 0 4 |a naturalness 
650 0 4 |a Poland [Central Europe] 
650 0 4 |a Primeval forest relics 
650 0 4 |a Red List 
650 0 4 |a Red-listed species 
650 0 4 |a relict species 
650 0 4 |a Species composition 
650 0 4 |a species richness 
650 0 4 |a Species richness 
650 0 4 |a Standing dead trees 
650 0 4 |a Tracheophyta 
650 0 4 |a Various substrates 
700 1 |a Cacciatori, C.  |e author 
700 1 |a Czerepko, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Gawryś, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Haidt, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Janek, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kowalewska, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kukwa, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Piegdoń, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Pisarek, W.  |e author 
700 1 |a Stebel, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Szymczyk, R.  |e author 
773 |t Ecological Indicators