Action co-representation under threat: A Social Simon study

Several studies have shown that individuals automatically integrate the actions of other individuals into their own action plans, thus facilitating action coordination. What happens to this mechanism in situations of danger? This capacity could either be reduced, in order to allocate more cognitive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beaurenaut, M. (Author), Dezecache, G. (Author), Grèzes, J. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02684nam a2200481Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.cognition.2021.104829
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00100277 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Action co-representation under threat: A Social Simon study 
260 0 |b Elsevier B.V.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104829 
520 3 |a Several studies have shown that individuals automatically integrate the actions of other individuals into their own action plans, thus facilitating action coordination. What happens to this mechanism in situations of danger? This capacity could either be reduced, in order to allocate more cognitive resources for individualistic actions, or be maintained or enhanced to enable cooperation under threat. In order to determine the impact of the perception of danger on this capacity, two groups of participants carried out, in pairs, the Social Simon task, which provides a measure of co-representation. The task was performed during so-called ‘threat blocks’ (during which participants could be exposed at any time to an aversive stimulus) and so-called ‘safety blocks’ (during which no aversive stimulation could occur). In a first group of participants, both individuals were exposed at the same time to threat blocks. In a second group, only one of the two participants was exposed to them at a time. Our results indicate that co-representation, an important cognitive mechanism for cooperation, (i) is preserved in situations of danger; and (ii) may even be increased in participants who are confronted alone to threat but in the presence of a safe partner. Contrarily to popular belief, danger does not shut down our capacities for social interaction. © 2021 The Authors 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a anxiety 
650 0 4 |a Anxiety 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a case report 
650 0 4 |a clinical article 
650 0 4 |a cooperation 
650 0 4 |a Cooperative Behavior 
650 0 4 |a Co-representation 
650 0 4 |a drug safety 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human experiment 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a individuality 
650 0 4 |a Individuality 
650 0 4 |a Joint Simon effect 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a perception 
650 0 4 |a psychomotor performance 
650 0 4 |a Psychomotor Performance 
650 0 4 |a reaction time 
650 0 4 |a Reaction Time 
650 0 4 |a Simon task 
650 0 4 |a Social buffering 
650 0 4 |a social interaction 
650 0 4 |a Threat 
700 1 |a Beaurenaut, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Dezecache, G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Grèzes, J.  |e author 
773 |t Cognition