Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system

Background: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i sys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nam, M. (Author), Park, K.U (Author), Roh, E.Y (Author), Shin, S. (Author), Song, D.Y (Author), Song, E.Y (Author), Song, S.H (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 04585nam a2200997Ia 4500
001 10.1002-jcla.23671
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 08878013 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system 
260 0 |b John Wiley and Sons Inc  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23671 
520 3 |a Background: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i system, which is a newly developed immunoassay to diagnose infectious diseases, was evaluated. Methods: We evaluated the precision, linearity, correlation, and carryover of 16 analytes (HAV Ab IgG, HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBe, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, HIV Ag/Ab, EBV VCA IgM, EBV VCA IgG, EBV EBNA IgG, CMV IgM, CMV IgG, Toxoplasma IgG, Rubella IgG, and Syphilis TP) of Alinity i by comparison with ARCHITECT i2000SR system following the rationale of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Results: For quantitative tests, the coefficients of variation (CV) % of repeatability and intermediate precision were between 0% and 4.18%. The coefficients of the linearity (r2) over a widely tested analytical range were ≥ 0.990 and the correlation between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000SR system was strong (r ≥ 0.994). For qualitative tests, the agreement between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000SR system was excellent (kappa coefficient 1) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Carryover rates for all analytes were less than 1.0% (−0.11% ~ 0.21%). Conclusion: The Alinity i system showed good analytical performance and favorable comparability with the ARCHITECT i2000SR. It could be suitable as a routine immunoassay analyzer for screening and diagnosis of infectious disease. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Alinity i system 
650 0 4 |a analytical performance 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a blood 
650 0 4 |a comparison study 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a Cytomegalovirus 
650 0 4 |a Cytomegalovirus 
650 0 4 |a cytomegalovirus infection 
650 0 4 |a devices 
650 0 4 |a diagnosis 
650 0 4 |a diagnostic test accuracy study 
650 0 4 |a Epstein Barr virus antigen 
650 0 4 |a Epstein Barr virus infection 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis A 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis A antibody 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis B 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis B core antibody 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis B surface antibody 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis B surface antigen 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis B surface antigen 
650 0 4 |a Hepatitis B Surface Antigens 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis B(e) antibody 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis B(e) antigen 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis C 
650 0 4 |a hepatitis C antibody 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Human immunodeficiency virus antibody 
650 0 4 |a Human immunodeficiency virus antigen 
650 0 4 |a Human immunodeficiency virus infection 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a immunoassay 
650 0 4 |a immunoassay 
650 0 4 |a immunoassay 
650 0 4 |a Immunoassay 
650 0 4 |a immunoglobulin G 
650 0 4 |a immunoglobulin G 
650 0 4 |a Immunoglobulin G 
650 0 4 |a immunoglobulin M 
650 0 4 |a immunology 
650 0 4 |a infection 
650 0 4 |a Infections 
650 0 4 |a infectious disease 
650 0 4 |a intermethod comparison 
650 0 4 |a linear system 
650 0 4 |a measurement precision 
650 0 4 |a measurement repeatability 
650 0 4 |a procedures 
650 0 4 |a qualitative analysis 
650 0 4 |a reproducibility 
650 0 4 |a Reproducibility of Results 
650 0 4 |a rubella 
650 0 4 |a rubella 
650 0 4 |a Rubella 
650 0 4 |a screening 
650 0 4 |a sensitivity and specificity 
650 0 4 |a Serologic Tests 
650 0 4 |a serology 
650 0 4 |a syphilis 
650 0 4 |a syphilis 
650 0 4 |a Syphilis 
650 0 4 |a Toxoplasma 
650 0 4 |a Toxoplasma 
650 0 4 |a toxoplasmosis 
650 0 4 |a virus capsid antigen 
700 1 |a Nam, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Park, K.U.  |e author 
700 1 |a Roh, E.Y.  |e author 
700 1 |a Shin, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Song, D.Y.  |e author 
700 1 |a Song, E.Y.  |e author 
700 1 |a Song, S.H.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis