Repeatability and reproducibility of human brain morphometry using three-dimensional magnetic resonance fingerprinting

• Main Authors: Abe, O. (Author), Aoki, S. (Author), Buonincontri, G. (Author), Cencini, M. (Author), Fujita, S. (Author), Fukunaga, I. (Author), Hagiwara, A. (Author), Hori, M. (Author), Kamagata, K. (Author), Schulte, R.F (Author), Takei, N. (Author), Uchida, W. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc 2021
• Subjects: adult; Adult; aged; Aged; article; attention; body weight; brain; Brain; Brain Cortical Thickness; controlled study; correlation coefficient; cortical thickness (brain); diagnostic imaging; female; Female; human; human brain imaging; human experiment; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; magnetic resonance fingerprinting; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; male; Male; middle aged; Middle Aged; morphometry; nuclear magnetic resonance; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; organ size; Organ Size; physiology; relaxometry; repeatability; reproducibility; Reproducibility of Results; software; three-dimensional imaging; young adult; Young Adult
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher
• ISBN: 10659471 (ISSN)
• DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25232

Three-dimensional (3D) Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) permits whole-brain volumetric quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation values, potentially replacing conventional T1-weighted structural imaging for common brain imaging analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of 3D MRF in evaluating brain cortical thickness and subcortical volumetric analysis in healthy volunteers using conventional 3D T1-weighted images as a reference standard. Scan-rescan tests of both 3D MRF and conventional 3D fast spoiled gradient recalled echo (FSPGR) were performed. For each sequence, the regional cortical thickness and volume of the subcortical structures were measured using standard automatic brain segmentation software. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and mean percent difference and ICC, respectively. The wCV and ICC of cortical thickness were similar across all regions with both 3D MRF and FSPGR. The percent relative difference in cortical thickness between 3D MRF and FSPGR across all regions was 8.0 ± 3.2%. The wCV and ICC of the volume of subcortical structures across all structures were similar between 3D MRF and FSPGR. The percent relative difference in the volume of subcortical structures between 3D MRF and FSPGR across all structures was 7.1 ± 3.6%. 3D MRF measurements of human brain cortical thickness and subcortical volumes are highly repeatable, and consistent with measurements taken on conventional 3D T1-weighted images. A slight, consistent bias was evident between the two, and thus careful attention is required when combining data from MRF and conventional acquisitions. © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.