Should the Decisions of Institutional Review Boards Be Consistent?
In response to increasing concerns regarding inconsistency in the decision-making of institutional review boards (IRBs), we introduce the decision-maker's dilemma, which arises when complex, normative decisions must be made regularly. Those faced with such decisions can either develop a process...
Main Authors: | Friesen, P. (Author), Sheehan, M. (Author), Yusof, A.N.M (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | View Fulltext in Publisher View in Scopus |
Similar Items
-
Who is informed and who uninformed? Addressing the legal barriers to progress in dementia research and care
by: Jiska Cohen-Mansfield
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Decision-making in the human subjects review system
by: Lane, Eliesh O'Neil
Published: (2005) -
Using Drones to Study Human Beings: Ethical and Regulatory Issues
by: Elliott, K.C, et al.
Published: (2019) -
What information and the extent of information research participants need in informed consent forms: a multi-country survey
by: Juntra Karbwang, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Autonomia, consentimento e vulnerabilidade do participante de pesquisa clínica
by: Danielle Cristina dos Santos Cosac