|
|
|
|
LEADER |
04392nam a2200829Ia 4500 |
001 |
10-1016-j-acra-2021-12-011 |
008 |
220420s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 10766332 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Characterization of Pediatric Imaging Trends and Likelihood of Exam Cancellation in the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Elsevier Inc.
|c 2022
|
300 |
|
|
|a 6
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.011
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Rationale and Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented changes in radiology practice worldwide. There is a need for a framework of pediatric radiology resource allocation for future acute resource-limited settings.The aim of this study is to quantify and analyze changes in pediatric radiology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic considering demographic and clinical characteristics. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively searched our institution's electronic health record for pediatric imaging exams from 09/15/19 to 05/01/20, with 03/15/20 as the dividing date between baseline and pandemic periods. Age, modality, exam indication, need for anesthesia/sedation, and exam completion or cancellation were recorded. All exams were compared between baseline and pandemic periods using a chi-square test and a logistic regression multivariate analysis. Results: 15,424 exams were included for analysis [13,715 baseline period (mean age 10±5 years; 7440 males); 1047 COVID-19 period (mean age 9±5 years; 565 males)]. A statistically significantly lower proportion of adolescent exams (45.5% vs 53.3%), radiography modality (62.4% vs 70.4%) and non-traumatic pain indication (39.1% vs 46.3%) was observed during the COVID-19 period. Conversely, we found a higher proportion of neonatal (5.8% vs 3.8%), infant (5.6% vs 4.1%) and early childhood patients (12.9% vs 9.8%), CT (7.4% vs 5.9%) and ultrasound modalities (18.3% vs 13.5%), oncologic (8.8% vs 6.5%) and congenital/development disorder indications (6% vs 3.9%), and studies performed under anesthesia (2.7% vs 1.3%). Regarding exam completion rates, the neonatal age group (OR 1.960 [95% CI 0.353 – 0.591]; p <0.020) and MRI modality (OR 1.502 [95% CI: 0.214 – 0.318]; p <0.049) had higher odds of completion during the COVID-19 pandemic, while fluoroscopy modality was associated with lower odds of completion (OR 0.524 [95% CI: 0.328 – 0.839]; p = 0.011). Conclusion: The composition and completion of pediatric radiology exams changed substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic. A sub-set of exams resilient to cancellation was identified. © 2021 The Association of University Radiologists
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a adolescent
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Adolescent
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a age
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a anesthesia
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Anesthesia
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cancellation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Child, Preschool
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Children
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a clinical study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a computer assisted tomography
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a congenital disorder
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a controlled study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a coronavirus disease 2019
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a COVID-19
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a demographics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a developmental disorder
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a electronic health record
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a epidemiology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a examination
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a female
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a fluoroscopy
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Imaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a infant
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Infant
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Infant, Newborn
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a major clinical study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a male
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Male
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a multivariate logistic regression analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a newborn
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a oncological procedure
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Orders
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pain
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pandemic
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pandemic
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pandemics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pediatric radiology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pediatrics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a preschool child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a radiology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Radiology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Retrospective Studies
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a retrospective study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a SARS-CoV-2
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a sex difference
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a trend study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a ultrasound
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Briggs, D.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Gallo-Bernal, S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Gee, M.S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Machado-Rivas, F.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Pianykh, O.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Academic Radiology
|