Behavior of Low-Cost Receivers in Base-Rover Configuration with Geodetic-Grade Antennas

The main goal of this research was to evaluate the performances of the ZED-F9P-Ublox low-cost GNSS receiver in a base-rover real configuration. We realized a base configuration with two permanent stations based on the ZED-F9P and two geodetic antennas and the rover configuration based on another ZED...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garau, S. (Author), Pisanu, T. (Author), Sanna, G. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02709nam a2200457Ia 4500
001 0.3390-s22072779
008 220421s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14248220 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Behavior of Low-Cost Receivers in Base-Rover Configuration with Geodetic-Grade Antennas 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072779 
520 3 |a The main goal of this research was to evaluate the performances of the ZED-F9P-Ublox low-cost GNSS receiver in a base-rover real configuration. We realized a base configuration with two permanent stations based on the ZED-F9P and two geodetic antennas and the rover configuration based on another ZED-F9P and an ANN-MB-00-00 Multi-band (L1, L2/E5b/B2I) active GNSS u-blox antenna. In the calculation of the reference stations, we compared the solutions with the ZED-F9P receiver and a professional receiver. Comparison showed greater variability in the solutions, but the coordinate values were in very good agreement. Standard deviations were in the order of a few millimeters. On the rover side, two car tests were performed in two different environments, one in an extra-urban environment with a long baseline of approximately 30 km in an open sky area with varying visibility and shielded locations, the other one in an urban area around a circle approximately 10 km in diameter with the presence of buildings and open sectors. The results of the measurements were very good, with more than 95% of fixed solutions in real-time and a time to fix on reacquisition of 1 or 2 s. Moreover, real-time kinematic solutions were in good agreement with the post-processed ones, showing that less than 5% of differences were above 30 mm in the horizontal component and 100 mm in the vertical component. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a calculation 
650 0 4 |a Costs 
650 0 4 |a Geodesy 
650 0 4 |a Geodetic satellites 
650 0 4 |a Global positioning system 
650 0 4 |a GNSS receivers 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Land surveying 
650 0 4 |a land-surveying 
650 0 4 |a low-cost GNSS receiver 
650 0 4 |a Low-cost GNSS receiver 
650 0 4 |a Low-costs 
650 0 4 |a Multi band 
650 0 4 |a network RTK 
650 0 4 |a Network RTK 
650 0 4 |a Performance 
650 0 4 |a Reference stations 
650 0 4 |a Satellite antennas 
650 0 4 |a Signal receivers 
650 0 4 |a Standard deviation 
650 0 4 |a u-blox ZED-F9P2 
650 0 4 |a U-blox ZED-f9p2 
650 0 4 |a urban area 
650 0 4 |a visibility 
700 1 0 |a Garau, S.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pisanu, T.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sanna, G.  |e author 
773 |t Sensors