|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03016nam a2200457Ia 4500 |
001 |
0.1007-s42064-022-0134-4 |
008 |
220421s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 25220098 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Real-time space object tracklet extraction from telescope survey images with machine learning
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Tsinghua University
|c 2022
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-022-0134-4
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a In this study, a novel approach based on the U-Net deep neural network for image segmentation is leveraged for real-time extraction of tracklets from optical acquisitions. As in all machine learning (ML) applications, a series of steps is required for a working pipeline: dataset creation, preprocessing, training, testing, and post-processing to refine the trained network output. Online websites usually lack ready-to-use datasets; thus, an in-house application artificially generates 360 labeled images. Particularly, this software tool produces synthetic night-sky shots of transiting objects over a specified location and the corresponding labels: dual-tone pictures with black backgrounds and white tracklets. Second, both images and labels are downscaled in resolution and normalized to accelerate the training phase. To assess the network performance, a set of both synthetic and real images was inputted. After the preprocessing phase, real images were fine-tuned for vignette reduction and background brightness uniformity. Additionally, they are down-converted to eight bits. Once the network outputs labels, post-processing identifies the centroid right ascension and declination of the object. The average processing time per real image is less than 1.2 s; bright tracklets are easily detected with a mean centroid angular error of 0.25 deg in 75% of test cases with a 2 deg field-of-view telescope. These results prove that an ML-based method can be considered a valid choice when dealing with trail reconstruction, leading to acceptable accuracy for a fast image processing pipeline. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2022, The Author(s).
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Deep neural networks
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Image segmentation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Machine learning
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a machine learning (ML)
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pipeline processing systems
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pipelines
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Post-processing
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Real images
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Real- time
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a space debris
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Space debris
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Space objects
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Space surveillance
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Space surveillance and tracking
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a space surveillance and tracking (SST)
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Statistical tests
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Telescope image
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a telescope images
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Telescopes
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Time-space
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a tracklet
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Tracklets
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a U-net
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a U-Net
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Cipollone, R.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a De Vittori, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Di Lizia, P.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massari, M.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Astrodynamics
|