The Influential Role of Powder Factor vs. Delay in Full-Scale Blasting: A Perspective Through the Fragment Size-Energy Fan

The fragmentation of 12 full-scale one-row blasts has been measured by sieving a large portion of the muckpiles. The procedure followed, the difficulties encountered and the solutions adopted to construct the fragment size distribution curves are described in detail; 11 curves were finally construct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gómez, S. (Author), Ouchterlony, F. (Author), Sanchidrián, J.A (Author), Segarra, P. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 04050nam a2200457Ia 4500
001 0.1007-s00603-022-02856-1
008 220421s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 07232632 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The Influential Role of Powder Factor vs. Delay in Full-Scale Blasting: A Perspective Through the Fragment Size-Energy Fan 
260 0 |b Springer  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02856-1 
520 3 |a The fragmentation of 12 full-scale one-row blasts has been measured by sieving a large portion of the muckpiles. The procedure followed, the difficulties encountered and the solutions adopted to construct the fragment size distribution curves are described in detail; 11 curves were finally constructed as production constraints prevented the required measurements on one of the blasts. The blasts covered a powder factor range between 0.42 and 0.88 kg/m3, and were initiated with two significantly different delays, 4 and 23 ms between holes, to assess the influence of both powder factor and delay on fragmentation. The size distributions are well represented by the Swebrec function, which strongly suggests that the dependence of fragmentation with the powder factor can be analyzed by the fragmentation-energy fan. The result is excellent, and the frag-energy fan model in its simplest form (a four-parameter function) is able to predict sizes between percentage passings 92 to 8% with a mean error of 14.4% and a determination coefficient R2 as high as 0.976. The powder factor above grade has been used, in its energy form obtained as the product of the mass powder factor by the explosive energy per unit mass. The incorporation of six more fragment size distributions, also obtained by sieving in a previous blasting project in the same rock mass, but with different layouts, explosives, delay and blast direction, only reduces R2 to 0.968 and increases the mean error to 15.3%. A strength dependence with the size of the blasted block (burden, bench height, etc.) has been tested for inclusion in the fan formulation, with minor improvement compared with the powder factor alone, as the variation in size of the blasts was very limited. Some size descriptors as in-situ block size and fracture intensity have also been tested, though variations were also limited as all blasts were carried out in the same quarry site, not improving the prediction errors when other blast dimensions (e.g., burden) are used. Incorporating the effect of delay in the fragmentation-energy fan model has been attempted with a cooperation function modifying the powder factor, increasing from instantaneous to an optimum delay value, then decreasing as the delay further increases. The effect of such a function is noticeable in terms of improved prediction; the data analyzed, however, do not allow for a definitive statement on an optimum delay value as calculations with different fan characteristics and data result in different optimum values. The effect of the delay on the fragment size varies with the percentile, from about 10–15% for the high percentiles to somewhat more than 30% for the lower percentiles. © 2022, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a Blasting 
650 0 4 |a Delay 
650 0 4 |a Delay 
650 0 4 |a Energy 
650 0 4 |a Errors 
650 0 4 |a Explosives 
650 0 4 |a Forecasting 
650 0 4 |a Fragment size distribution 
650 0 4 |a Fragment sizes 
650 0 4 |a Fragmentation energy 
650 0 4 |a Image analysis 
650 0 4 |a Image analysis 
650 0 4 |a Image-analysis 
650 0 4 |a Rock blasting 
650 0 4 |a Rock blasting 
650 0 4 |a Rock bursts 
650 0 4 |a Rock fragmentation 
650 0 4 |a Rock fragmentation 
650 0 4 |a Rocks 
650 0 4 |a Sieving 
650 0 4 |a Sieving 
650 0 4 |a Size distribution 
650 0 4 |a Swebrec 
650 0 4 |a Swebrec 
700 1 0 |a Gómez, S.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ouchterlony, F.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sanchidrián, J.A.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Segarra, P.  |e author 
773 |t Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering