|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02623naaaa2200313uu 4500 |
001 |
49302 |
005 |
20210602 |
020 |
|
|
|a intechopen.90410
|
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.5772/intechopen.90410
|c doi
|
041 |
0 |
|
|h English
|
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Valentin, Benoît
|e auth
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49302
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Zaversky, Fritz
|e auth
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Les, Iñigo
|e auth
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Berard, Flavien
|e auth
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Brau, Jean-Florian
|e auth
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Sánchez, Marcelino
|e auth
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a McGuire, Jonathon
|e auth
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Siros, Frédéric
|e auth
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Chapter Techno-Economic Optimization and Benchmarking of a Solar-Only Powered Combined Cycle with High-Temperature TES Upstream the Gas Turbine
|
260 |
|
|
|b InTechOpen
|c 2019
|
506 |
0 |
|
|a Open Access
|2 star
|f Unrestricted online access
|
520 |
|
|
|a This work presents a techno-economic parametric study of an innovative central receiver solar thermal power plant layout that applies the combined cycle (CC) as thermodynamic power cycle and a multi-tower solar field configuration together with open volumetric air receivers (OVARs). The topping gas turbine (GT) is powered by an air-air heat exchanger (two heat exchanger trains in the case of reheat). In order to provide dispatchability, a high-temperature thermocline TES system is placed upstream the gas turbine. The aim is threefold, (i) investigating whether the multi-tower concept has a techno-economic advantage with respect to conventional single-tower central receiver plants, (ii) indicating the techno-economic optimum power plant configuration, and (iii) benchmarking the techno-economic optimum of the CC plant against that of a conventional single-cycle Rankine steam plant with the same receiver and TES technology. It is concluded that the multi-tower configuration has a techno-economic advantage with respect to the conventional single-tower arrangement above a total nominal solar power level of about 150 MW. However, the benchmarking of the CC against a Rankine single-cycle power plant layout shows that the CC configuration has despite its higher solar-to-electric conversion efficiency a higher LCOE. The gain in electricity yield is not enough to outweigh the higher investment costs of the more complex CC plant layout.
|
540 |
|
|
|a Creative Commons
|
546 |
|
|
|a English
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Engineering: general
|2 bicssc
|
653 |
|
|
|a concentrated solar power, solar combined cycle, multi-tower central receiver, open volumetric air receiver (OVAR)
|
773 |
1 |
0 |
|0 OAPEN Library ID: ONIX_20210602_10.5772/intechopen.90410_416
|7 nnaa
|