Chapter Transport Protocol Performance and Impact on QoS while on the Move in Current and Future Low Latency Deployments

Transport protocols and mobile networks have evolved independently leading to a lack of adaptability and quality of service (QoS) degradation while running under the variability circumstances present in cellular access. This chapter evaluates the performance of state-of-the-art transmission control...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liberal, Fidel (auth)
Other Authors: Oscar Fajardo, Jose (auth), Atxutegi, Eneko (auth)
Format: eBook
Published: InTechOpen 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02470naaaa2200253uu 4500
001 49280
005 20210602
020 |a intechopen.71779 
024 7 |a 10.5772/intechopen.71779  |c doi 
041 0 |h English 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Liberal, Fidel  |e auth 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49280 
700 1 |a Oscar Fajardo, Jose  |e auth 
700 1 |a Atxutegi, Eneko  |e auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter Transport Protocol Performance and Impact on QoS while on the Move in Current and Future Low Latency Deployments 
260 |b InTechOpen  |c 2018 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Transport protocols and mobile networks have evolved independently leading to a lack of adaptability and quality of service (QoS) degradation while running under the variability circumstances present in cellular access. This chapter evaluates the performance of state-of-the-art transmission control protocol (TCP) implementations in challenging mobility scenarios under 4G latencies and low delays that model the proximity service provisioning of forthcoming 5G networks. The evaluation is focused on selecting the most appropriate TCP flavor for each scenario taking into account two metrics: (1) the goodput-based performance and (2) a balanced performance metric that includes parameters based on goodput, delay and retransmitted packets. The results show that mobility scenarios under 4G latencies require more aggressive TCP solutions in order to overcome the high variability in comparison with low latency conditions. Bottleneck Bandwidth and Round-Trip Time-RTT (BBR) provides better scalability than others and Illinois is more capable of sustaining the goodput with big variability between consecutive samples. Besides, CUBIC performs better in lower available capacity scenarios and regarding the balanced metric. In reduced end-to-end latencies, the most suitable congestion control algorithms (CCAs) to maximize the goodput are NewReno (low available capacity) and CUBIC (high available capacity) when moving with continuous capacity increases. Additionally, BBR shows a balanced and controlled behavior in most of the scenarios. 
540 |a Creative Commons 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Communications engineering / telecommunications  |2 bicssc 
653 |a transport protocols, performance, mobility, 4G, low latency, 5G 
773 1 0 |0 OAPEN Library ID: ONIX_20210602_10.5772/intechopen.71779_394  |7 nnaa