Negotiating Asylum : The EU Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection

How is access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU acquis in these areas in conformity with international law? Which tools does international law offer to solve collisions between both? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the founda...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Noll, Gregor (Editor)
Format: eBook
Published: Brill 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02107naaaa2200265uu 4500
001 48335
005 20210422
020 |a 9789004461543 
020 |a 9789004461543 
020 |a 9789041114310 
024 7 |a 10.1163/9789004461543  |c doi 
041 0 |h English 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Noll, Gregor  |e edt 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48335 
700 1 |a Noll, Gregor  |e oth 
245 1 0 |a Negotiating Asylum : The EU Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection 
260 |b Brill  |c 2000 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (644 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a How is access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU acquis in these areas in conformity with international law? Which tools does international law offer to solve collisions between both? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the foundational oppositions embedded in migration and asylum issues? This work combines the potential of legal formalism with an analytical framework drawing on political theory. It analyses the argumentative strategies used by international lawyers, and developed them further, exploiting the interpretative methodology of international law as well as elaborate discrimination arguments. The author concludes that deflecting protection seekers by means of visa requirements may constitute a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, and that the prescriptions of international law oblige Member States to apply the Dublin Convention and the Spanish Protocol in a manner emptying it of its main control functions. The author also shows that burden-sharing remains the pivotal element in the normative dynamics behind the EU acquis, and explains why the European Court of Human Rights must be regarded as the only transnational forum for the legitimate negotiation of asylum in Europe. 
540 |a Creative Commons 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a International human rights law  |2 bicssc 
653 |a International human rights law