Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers
Co-teaching has been used to address access and accountability mandates for students with disabilities. Despite research regarding elements needed for co-teaching success, research shows mixed results regarding co-teaching effectiveness as it relates to student achievement. Given that teachers are t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
W&M ScholarWorks
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539618511 https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1721&context=etd |
id |
ndltd-wm.edu-oai-scholarworks.wm.edu-etd-1721 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-wm.edu-oai-scholarworks.wm.edu-etd-17212021-09-18T05:29:35Z Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers Boyd, Michelle Co-teaching has been used to address access and accountability mandates for students with disabilities. Despite research regarding elements needed for co-teaching success, research shows mixed results regarding co-teaching effectiveness as it relates to student achievement. Given that teachers are the most influential school-related factor vis-a-vis student achievement, this quantitative study, utilizing a cross-sectional survey design, was employed to gain additional information regarding urban, secondary co-teacher perceptions of co-teaching. to that end the Co-teacher Perceptions Survey was administered to 95 middle and high school co-teachers in an urban school district situated in eastern Virginia. Results of this study indicate that successful co-teachers have higher perceptions of co-teaching, co-teacher philosophy and co-planning than unsuccessful co-teachers. Successful co-teachers also have different perceived use of co-teaching models than unsuccessful co-teachers as they use station and alternative teaching more often than their unsuccessful counterparts. However, no differences were noted in co-teacher perceptions for the following subgroups: general and special education co-teachers, middle and high school co-teachers, novice and veteran co-teachers, and voluntary and non-voluntary co-teachers. Implications for practice include ensuring both co-teachers are held equally responsible for student performance in co-taught classes and incorporating co-planning time in the master schedule with high expectations for deliverables from the co-planning process. 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539618511 https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1721&context=etd © The Author Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects English W&M ScholarWorks Special Education and Teaching |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Special Education and Teaching |
spellingShingle |
Special Education and Teaching Boyd, Michelle Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers |
description |
Co-teaching has been used to address access and accountability mandates for students with disabilities. Despite research regarding elements needed for co-teaching success, research shows mixed results regarding co-teaching effectiveness as it relates to student achievement. Given that teachers are the most influential school-related factor vis-a-vis student achievement, this quantitative study, utilizing a cross-sectional survey design, was employed to gain additional information regarding urban, secondary co-teacher perceptions of co-teaching. to that end the Co-teacher Perceptions Survey was administered to 95 middle and high school co-teachers in an urban school district situated in eastern Virginia. Results of this study indicate that successful co-teachers have higher perceptions of co-teaching, co-teacher philosophy and co-planning than unsuccessful co-teachers. Successful co-teachers also have different perceived use of co-teaching models than unsuccessful co-teachers as they use station and alternative teaching more often than their unsuccessful counterparts. However, no differences were noted in co-teacher perceptions for the following subgroups: general and special education co-teachers, middle and high school co-teachers, novice and veteran co-teachers, and voluntary and non-voluntary co-teachers. Implications for practice include ensuring both co-teachers are held equally responsible for student performance in co-taught classes and incorporating co-planning time in the master schedule with high expectations for deliverables from the co-planning process. |
author |
Boyd, Michelle |
author_facet |
Boyd, Michelle |
author_sort |
Boyd, Michelle |
title |
Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers |
title_short |
Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers |
title_full |
Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers |
title_fullStr |
Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers |
title_sort |
co-teaching: perceptions of urban, secondary co-teachers |
publisher |
W&M ScholarWorks |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539618511 https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1721&context=etd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT boydmichelle coteachingperceptionsofurbansecondarycoteachers |
_version_ |
1719481692995977216 |