Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers

Co-teaching has been used to address access and accountability mandates for students with disabilities. Despite research regarding elements needed for co-teaching success, research shows mixed results regarding co-teaching effectiveness as it relates to student achievement. Given that teachers are t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Boyd, Michelle
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: W&M ScholarWorks 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539618511
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1721&context=etd
id ndltd-wm.edu-oai-scholarworks.wm.edu-etd-1721
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-wm.edu-oai-scholarworks.wm.edu-etd-17212021-09-18T05:29:35Z Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers Boyd, Michelle Co-teaching has been used to address access and accountability mandates for students with disabilities. Despite research regarding elements needed for co-teaching success, research shows mixed results regarding co-teaching effectiveness as it relates to student achievement. Given that teachers are the most influential school-related factor vis-a-vis student achievement, this quantitative study, utilizing a cross-sectional survey design, was employed to gain additional information regarding urban, secondary co-teacher perceptions of co-teaching. to that end the Co-teacher Perceptions Survey was administered to 95 middle and high school co-teachers in an urban school district situated in eastern Virginia. Results of this study indicate that successful co-teachers have higher perceptions of co-teaching, co-teacher philosophy and co-planning than unsuccessful co-teachers. Successful co-teachers also have different perceived use of co-teaching models than unsuccessful co-teachers as they use station and alternative teaching more often than their unsuccessful counterparts. However, no differences were noted in co-teacher perceptions for the following subgroups: general and special education co-teachers, middle and high school co-teachers, novice and veteran co-teachers, and voluntary and non-voluntary co-teachers. Implications for practice include ensuring both co-teachers are held equally responsible for student performance in co-taught classes and incorporating co-planning time in the master schedule with high expectations for deliverables from the co-planning process. 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539618511 https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1721&context=etd © The Author Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects English W&M ScholarWorks Special Education and Teaching
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Special Education and Teaching
spellingShingle Special Education and Teaching
Boyd, Michelle
Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers
description Co-teaching has been used to address access and accountability mandates for students with disabilities. Despite research regarding elements needed for co-teaching success, research shows mixed results regarding co-teaching effectiveness as it relates to student achievement. Given that teachers are the most influential school-related factor vis-a-vis student achievement, this quantitative study, utilizing a cross-sectional survey design, was employed to gain additional information regarding urban, secondary co-teacher perceptions of co-teaching. to that end the Co-teacher Perceptions Survey was administered to 95 middle and high school co-teachers in an urban school district situated in eastern Virginia. Results of this study indicate that successful co-teachers have higher perceptions of co-teaching, co-teacher philosophy and co-planning than unsuccessful co-teachers. Successful co-teachers also have different perceived use of co-teaching models than unsuccessful co-teachers as they use station and alternative teaching more often than their unsuccessful counterparts. However, no differences were noted in co-teacher perceptions for the following subgroups: general and special education co-teachers, middle and high school co-teachers, novice and veteran co-teachers, and voluntary and non-voluntary co-teachers. Implications for practice include ensuring both co-teachers are held equally responsible for student performance in co-taught classes and incorporating co-planning time in the master schedule with high expectations for deliverables from the co-planning process.
author Boyd, Michelle
author_facet Boyd, Michelle
author_sort Boyd, Michelle
title Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers
title_short Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers
title_full Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers
title_fullStr Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers
title_full_unstemmed Co-teaching: Perceptions of Urban, Secondary Co-Teachers
title_sort co-teaching: perceptions of urban, secondary co-teachers
publisher W&M ScholarWorks
publishDate 2013
url https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539618511
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1721&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT boydmichelle coteachingperceptionsofurbansecondarycoteachers
_version_ 1719481692995977216