Alternative to Proctoring in Introductory Statistics Community College Courses

The credibility of unsupervised exams, one of the biggest challenges of e-learning, is currently maintained by proctoring. However, little has been done to determine whether expensive and inconvenient proctoring is necessary. The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine whether the use of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Feinman, Lena
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: ScholarWorks 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4622
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5902&context=dissertations
id ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-5902
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-59022019-10-30T01:23:50Z Alternative to Proctoring in Introductory Statistics Community College Courses Feinman, Lena The credibility of unsupervised exams, one of the biggest challenges of e-learning, is currently maintained by proctoring. However, little has been done to determine whether expensive and inconvenient proctoring is necessary. The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine whether the use of security mechanisms, based on the taxonomy of cheating reduction techniques rooted in the fraud triangle theory, can be an effective alternative to proctoring. A quasi-experimental 1 group sequential design was used to answer the research questions whether the format, proctored versus unproctored, order in which the exams are administered, course delivery mode, and instructor make a difference in student performance. The archival scores of 850 Californian community college students on 2 sets of equivalent proctored and unproctored web-based exams in face-to-face, hybrid, and online introductory statistics courses taught by 7 instructors were compared. The format effect was tested with repeated-measures ANOVA; the order, course delivery mode and instructor effects were tested with mixed ANOVA. No significant difference in scores in Set 1, and significantly lower scores on unproctored exams in Set 2 indicated that the used security mechanisms allowed for maintaining the credibility of the exams without proctoring. There was no significant difference in scores across the course delivery modes in both sets and instructors in Set 2, but significant order effect was observed. Further research on order effect was recommended. With the use of the utilized security mechanisms education will get an inexpensive and convenient way to increase the credibility of unsupervised web-based exams, and the society will gain more online college graduates with credentials that reflect their knowledge. 2018-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4622 https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5902&context=dissertations Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies en ScholarWorks course delivery mode effect order effect security mechanisms taxonomy of cheating prevention techniques unproctored exams web-based assessment Instructional Media Design
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic course delivery mode effect
order effect
security mechanisms
taxonomy of cheating prevention techniques
unproctored exams
web-based assessment
Instructional Media Design
spellingShingle course delivery mode effect
order effect
security mechanisms
taxonomy of cheating prevention techniques
unproctored exams
web-based assessment
Instructional Media Design
Feinman, Lena
Alternative to Proctoring in Introductory Statistics Community College Courses
description The credibility of unsupervised exams, one of the biggest challenges of e-learning, is currently maintained by proctoring. However, little has been done to determine whether expensive and inconvenient proctoring is necessary. The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine whether the use of security mechanisms, based on the taxonomy of cheating reduction techniques rooted in the fraud triangle theory, can be an effective alternative to proctoring. A quasi-experimental 1 group sequential design was used to answer the research questions whether the format, proctored versus unproctored, order in which the exams are administered, course delivery mode, and instructor make a difference in student performance. The archival scores of 850 Californian community college students on 2 sets of equivalent proctored and unproctored web-based exams in face-to-face, hybrid, and online introductory statistics courses taught by 7 instructors were compared. The format effect was tested with repeated-measures ANOVA; the order, course delivery mode and instructor effects were tested with mixed ANOVA. No significant difference in scores in Set 1, and significantly lower scores on unproctored exams in Set 2 indicated that the used security mechanisms allowed for maintaining the credibility of the exams without proctoring. There was no significant difference in scores across the course delivery modes in both sets and instructors in Set 2, but significant order effect was observed. Further research on order effect was recommended. With the use of the utilized security mechanisms education will get an inexpensive and convenient way to increase the credibility of unsupervised web-based exams, and the society will gain more online college graduates with credentials that reflect their knowledge.
author Feinman, Lena
author_facet Feinman, Lena
author_sort Feinman, Lena
title Alternative to Proctoring in Introductory Statistics Community College Courses
title_short Alternative to Proctoring in Introductory Statistics Community College Courses
title_full Alternative to Proctoring in Introductory Statistics Community College Courses
title_fullStr Alternative to Proctoring in Introductory Statistics Community College Courses
title_full_unstemmed Alternative to Proctoring in Introductory Statistics Community College Courses
title_sort alternative to proctoring in introductory statistics community college courses
publisher ScholarWorks
publishDate 2018
url https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4622
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5902&context=dissertations
work_keys_str_mv AT feinmanlena alternativetoproctoringinintroductorystatisticscommunitycollegecourses
_version_ 1719282231046832128