Working Memory Difficulties and Eligibility for K-12 Special Education

Working memory (WM) has long been associated with deficiencies in reading. Approximately 35% of students in the United States who receive special education services do so under the category of specific learning disability (SLD). The study's theoretical underpinning was Baddeley's model of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wilson, Corrie L.
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: ScholarWorks 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4190
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5293&context=dissertations
id ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-5293
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-52932019-10-30T01:23:04Z Working Memory Difficulties and Eligibility for K-12 Special Education Wilson, Corrie L. Working memory (WM) has long been associated with deficiencies in reading. Approximately 35% of students in the United States who receive special education services do so under the category of specific learning disability (SLD). The study's theoretical underpinning was Baddeley's model of WM; previous research revealed a significant literature gap regarding how WM difficulties affect eligibility for special education under the category of SLD in reading. In this quasi-experimental study, a purposive sample was taken from archival data of two groups of K-12 students who had been referred for special education eligibility evaluation: The two groups were students evaluated for SLD in reading eligibility who (a) did not meet criteria and (b) did meet criteria. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to determine whether a significant difference existed between the two group's score differences between a measure of global intelligence and WM. Archival Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4th Edition, Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd Edition, or Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities, 3rd Edition scores were used. Although no significant difference was evidenced between global intelligence and WM, the group that did not meet SLD criteria had significantly better WM scores than the group that was found eligible for SLD. By better understanding the relationship between WM and special education eligibility, practitioners may be able to implement more meaningful, better targeted research based interventions for enhancing learning outcomes for students with reading SLD, a group at high risk for high school drop out. 2017-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4190 https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5293&context=dissertations Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies en ScholarWorks Reading Special Education Eligibility Specific Learning Disability Working Memory Psychology Special Education Administration Special Education and Teaching
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Reading
Special Education Eligibility
Specific Learning Disability
Working Memory
Psychology
Special Education Administration
Special Education and Teaching
spellingShingle Reading
Special Education Eligibility
Specific Learning Disability
Working Memory
Psychology
Special Education Administration
Special Education and Teaching
Wilson, Corrie L.
Working Memory Difficulties and Eligibility for K-12 Special Education
description Working memory (WM) has long been associated with deficiencies in reading. Approximately 35% of students in the United States who receive special education services do so under the category of specific learning disability (SLD). The study's theoretical underpinning was Baddeley's model of WM; previous research revealed a significant literature gap regarding how WM difficulties affect eligibility for special education under the category of SLD in reading. In this quasi-experimental study, a purposive sample was taken from archival data of two groups of K-12 students who had been referred for special education eligibility evaluation: The two groups were students evaluated for SLD in reading eligibility who (a) did not meet criteria and (b) did meet criteria. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to determine whether a significant difference existed between the two group's score differences between a measure of global intelligence and WM. Archival Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4th Edition, Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd Edition, or Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities, 3rd Edition scores were used. Although no significant difference was evidenced between global intelligence and WM, the group that did not meet SLD criteria had significantly better WM scores than the group that was found eligible for SLD. By better understanding the relationship between WM and special education eligibility, practitioners may be able to implement more meaningful, better targeted research based interventions for enhancing learning outcomes for students with reading SLD, a group at high risk for high school drop out.
author Wilson, Corrie L.
author_facet Wilson, Corrie L.
author_sort Wilson, Corrie L.
title Working Memory Difficulties and Eligibility for K-12 Special Education
title_short Working Memory Difficulties and Eligibility for K-12 Special Education
title_full Working Memory Difficulties and Eligibility for K-12 Special Education
title_fullStr Working Memory Difficulties and Eligibility for K-12 Special Education
title_full_unstemmed Working Memory Difficulties and Eligibility for K-12 Special Education
title_sort working memory difficulties and eligibility for k-12 special education
publisher ScholarWorks
publishDate 2017
url https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4190
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5293&context=dissertations
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsoncorriel workingmemorydifficultiesandeligibilityfork12specialeducation
_version_ 1719282207189630976