Eyewitness to History in Devolution of Democracy and Constitutional Rights Following 9/11

Many researchers and political experts have commented on the disenfranchisement of the citizenry caused by irresponsible use of power by the government that potentially violates the 4th Amendment rights of millions of people through secret mass surveillance programs. Disclosures of this abuse of pow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Drake, Thomas
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: ScholarWorks 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/3672
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4775&context=dissertations
id ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-4775
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-47752019-10-30T01:17:38Z Eyewitness to History in Devolution of Democracy and Constitutional Rights Following 9/11 Drake, Thomas Many researchers and political experts have commented on the disenfranchisement of the citizenry caused by irresponsible use of power by the government that potentially violates the 4th Amendment rights of millions of people through secret mass surveillance programs. Disclosures of this abuse of power are presumably protected by the 1st Amendment, though when constitutional protections are not followed by the government, the result can be prosecution and imprisonment of whistleblowers. Using a critical autoethnographic approach, the purpose of this study was to examine the devolution of democratic governance and constitutional rights in the United States since 9/11. Using the phenomena of my signature indictment (the first whistleblower since Daniel Ellsberg was charged under the Espionage Act) and prosecution by the U.S. government, data were collected through interviews with experts associated with this unique circumstance. These data, including my own recollections of the event, were inductively coded and subjected to a thematic analysis procedure. The findings revealed that the use of national security as the primary grounds to suppress democracy and the voices of whistleblowers speaking truth to, and about, power increased authoritarian tendencies in government. These tendencies gave rise to extra-legal autocratic behavior and sovereign state control over the institutions of democratic governance. Positive social change can only take place in a society that has robust governance and social structures that strengthen democracy, human rights, and the rule of law, and do not inhibit or suppress them. 2017-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/3672 https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4775&context=dissertations Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies en ScholarWorks constitution and rule of law democratic governance human rights national security and secrecy privacy and liberty whistleblowers and truth tellers
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic constitution and rule of law
democratic governance
human rights
national security and secrecy
privacy and liberty
whistleblowers and truth tellers
spellingShingle constitution and rule of law
democratic governance
human rights
national security and secrecy
privacy and liberty
whistleblowers and truth tellers
Drake, Thomas
Eyewitness to History in Devolution of Democracy and Constitutional Rights Following 9/11
description Many researchers and political experts have commented on the disenfranchisement of the citizenry caused by irresponsible use of power by the government that potentially violates the 4th Amendment rights of millions of people through secret mass surveillance programs. Disclosures of this abuse of power are presumably protected by the 1st Amendment, though when constitutional protections are not followed by the government, the result can be prosecution and imprisonment of whistleblowers. Using a critical autoethnographic approach, the purpose of this study was to examine the devolution of democratic governance and constitutional rights in the United States since 9/11. Using the phenomena of my signature indictment (the first whistleblower since Daniel Ellsberg was charged under the Espionage Act) and prosecution by the U.S. government, data were collected through interviews with experts associated with this unique circumstance. These data, including my own recollections of the event, were inductively coded and subjected to a thematic analysis procedure. The findings revealed that the use of national security as the primary grounds to suppress democracy and the voices of whistleblowers speaking truth to, and about, power increased authoritarian tendencies in government. These tendencies gave rise to extra-legal autocratic behavior and sovereign state control over the institutions of democratic governance. Positive social change can only take place in a society that has robust governance and social structures that strengthen democracy, human rights, and the rule of law, and do not inhibit or suppress them.
author Drake, Thomas
author_facet Drake, Thomas
author_sort Drake, Thomas
title Eyewitness to History in Devolution of Democracy and Constitutional Rights Following 9/11
title_short Eyewitness to History in Devolution of Democracy and Constitutional Rights Following 9/11
title_full Eyewitness to History in Devolution of Democracy and Constitutional Rights Following 9/11
title_fullStr Eyewitness to History in Devolution of Democracy and Constitutional Rights Following 9/11
title_full_unstemmed Eyewitness to History in Devolution of Democracy and Constitutional Rights Following 9/11
title_sort eyewitness to history in devolution of democracy and constitutional rights following 9/11
publisher ScholarWorks
publishDate 2017
url https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/3672
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4775&context=dissertations
work_keys_str_mv AT drakethomas eyewitnesstohistoryindevolutionofdemocracyandconstitutionalrightsfollowing911
_version_ 1719281771778932736