Clinical Significance of Response Shift in a Spine Interventional Clinical Trial

The effectiveness of treatments for degenerative spine conditions, where the primary symptom is back pain, is typically determined using patient-reported quality of life (QoL) measures. However, patients may adjust their internal standards when scoring QoL based on factors other than their health. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carlson, Robin
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: ScholarWorks 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/231
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1230&context=dissertations
id ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-1230
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-12302019-10-30T01:22:41Z Clinical Significance of Response Shift in a Spine Interventional Clinical Trial Carlson, Robin The effectiveness of treatments for degenerative spine conditions, where the primary symptom is back pain, is typically determined using patient-reported quality of life (QoL) measures. However, patients may adjust their internal standards when scoring QoL based on factors other than their health. This response shift phenomenon could confound the interpretation of study data and impact effectiveness conclusions. In the current study, response shift was examined using structural equation modeling (SEM) and previously collected clinical trial data comparing 2 minimally invasive medical devices in lumbar spinal stenosis patients through 1 year postintervention. In subject QoL results, reprioritization shift between 3 months and 12 months that could confound standard analysis was identified. Treatment group did not influence response shift identified at 12 months. SEM provided an effective and practical tool for clinical investigators to assess response shift in available clinical study data. As response shift could lead to invalid conclusions when QoL measures are analyzed, clinical investigators should include response shift assessment in the design of clinical trials. This research into how response shift phenomenon can impact clinical trial results improves the ability of clinical investigators to interpret clinical trial data, potentially preventing erroneous conclusions. This research may also assist researchers and government regulators in the identification and reimbursement of beneficial, cost-effective medical treatments for patients worldwide. For clinical research designers, this study demonstrates a practical application of response shift assessment. 2015-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/231 https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1230&context=dissertations Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies en ScholarWorks Health related quality of Life Patient-reported outcomes Response Shift Spine Structural Equation Modeling Medicine and Health Sciences Operational Research Quantitative Psychology
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Health related quality of Life
Patient-reported outcomes
Response Shift
Spine
Structural Equation Modeling
Medicine and Health Sciences
Operational Research
Quantitative Psychology
spellingShingle Health related quality of Life
Patient-reported outcomes
Response Shift
Spine
Structural Equation Modeling
Medicine and Health Sciences
Operational Research
Quantitative Psychology
Carlson, Robin
Clinical Significance of Response Shift in a Spine Interventional Clinical Trial
description The effectiveness of treatments for degenerative spine conditions, where the primary symptom is back pain, is typically determined using patient-reported quality of life (QoL) measures. However, patients may adjust their internal standards when scoring QoL based on factors other than their health. This response shift phenomenon could confound the interpretation of study data and impact effectiveness conclusions. In the current study, response shift was examined using structural equation modeling (SEM) and previously collected clinical trial data comparing 2 minimally invasive medical devices in lumbar spinal stenosis patients through 1 year postintervention. In subject QoL results, reprioritization shift between 3 months and 12 months that could confound standard analysis was identified. Treatment group did not influence response shift identified at 12 months. SEM provided an effective and practical tool for clinical investigators to assess response shift in available clinical study data. As response shift could lead to invalid conclusions when QoL measures are analyzed, clinical investigators should include response shift assessment in the design of clinical trials. This research into how response shift phenomenon can impact clinical trial results improves the ability of clinical investigators to interpret clinical trial data, potentially preventing erroneous conclusions. This research may also assist researchers and government regulators in the identification and reimbursement of beneficial, cost-effective medical treatments for patients worldwide. For clinical research designers, this study demonstrates a practical application of response shift assessment.
author Carlson, Robin
author_facet Carlson, Robin
author_sort Carlson, Robin
title Clinical Significance of Response Shift in a Spine Interventional Clinical Trial
title_short Clinical Significance of Response Shift in a Spine Interventional Clinical Trial
title_full Clinical Significance of Response Shift in a Spine Interventional Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Clinical Significance of Response Shift in a Spine Interventional Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Significance of Response Shift in a Spine Interventional Clinical Trial
title_sort clinical significance of response shift in a spine interventional clinical trial
publisher ScholarWorks
publishDate 2015
url https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/231
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1230&context=dissertations
work_keys_str_mv AT carlsonrobin clinicalsignificanceofresponseshiftinaspineinterventionalclinicaltrial
_version_ 1719281987349381120