Semantique Et Grammaticalisation De 'Do' En Anglais: Approche Contrastive (The Semantax And Grammaticalization Of 'Do' In English: A Contrastive Study)
The subject of this contrastive study is fourfold: (a) it takes into account the inference of languages in contact in the diachronic development of English language; and it builds up a hypothesis on the origin of periphrastic DO; (b) this study lays its foundations on established facts from diachron...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | fr |
Published: |
Université Paris III - Sorbonne Nouvelle
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/71565 |
id |
ndltd-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-71565 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-715652020-10-03T06:13:37Z Semantique Et Grammaticalisation De 'Do' En Anglais: Approche Contrastive (The Semantax And Grammaticalization Of 'Do' In English: A Contrastive Study) Leoue, Jean Gilbert English Linguistics English Language sémantax grammatilization creolistics auxiliarization DO diachrony variation Utterer-centered approach PL PE P1 The subject of this contrastive study is fourfold: (a) it takes into account the inference of languages in contact in the diachronic development of English language; and it builds up a hypothesis on the origin of periphrastic DO; (b) this study lays its foundations on established facts from diachrony and etymology to claim that the grammaticalization of DO did not entail any process of desemantisation; (c) it also resorts to an invariant-meaning approach to show that the auxiliary DO – just like its lexical counterpart – is not meaningless in natural language; (d) it carries out a critical analysis of current trends on either a binary categorization or a ternary categorization for DO-forms (lexical verb (vs. proverb) vs. auxiliary). Then, this study shows that the proform DO SO can indeed substitute for purely stative predicates; and, as an operator of ‘thesis’, DO has an enunciative function which accounts for its occurrences as well as its non-occurrences in the linear structuring. 2016-06-27T19:03:45Z 2016-06-27T19:03:45Z 2004-03 Dissertation eprint:291 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/71565 fr In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ image/jpeg application/pdf application/pdf image/jpeg application/pdf Université Paris III - Sorbonne Nouvelle |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
fr |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
English Language sémantax grammatilization creolistics auxiliarization DO diachrony variation Utterer-centered approach PL PE P1 |
spellingShingle |
English Language sémantax grammatilization creolistics auxiliarization DO diachrony variation Utterer-centered approach PL PE P1 Leoue, Jean Gilbert Semantique Et Grammaticalisation De 'Do' En Anglais: Approche Contrastive (The Semantax And Grammaticalization Of 'Do' In English: A Contrastive Study) |
description |
The subject of this contrastive study is fourfold: (a) it takes into account the inference of languages in contact in the diachronic development of English language; and it builds up a hypothesis on the origin of periphrastic DO; (b) this study lays its foundations on established facts from diachrony and etymology to claim that the grammaticalization of DO did not entail any process of desemantisation; (c) it also resorts to an invariant-meaning approach to show that the auxiliary DO – just like its lexical counterpart – is not meaningless in natural language; (d) it carries out a critical analysis of current trends on either a binary categorization or a ternary categorization for DO-forms (lexical verb (vs. proverb) vs. auxiliary). Then, this study shows that the proform DO SO can indeed substitute for purely stative predicates; and, as an operator of ‘thesis’, DO has an enunciative function which accounts for its occurrences as well as its non-occurrences in the linear structuring. |
author2 |
English Linguistics |
author_facet |
English Linguistics Leoue, Jean Gilbert |
author |
Leoue, Jean Gilbert |
author_sort |
Leoue, Jean Gilbert |
title |
Semantique Et Grammaticalisation De 'Do' En Anglais: Approche Contrastive (The Semantax And Grammaticalization Of 'Do' In English: A Contrastive Study) |
title_short |
Semantique Et Grammaticalisation De 'Do' En Anglais: Approche Contrastive (The Semantax And Grammaticalization Of 'Do' In English: A Contrastive Study) |
title_full |
Semantique Et Grammaticalisation De 'Do' En Anglais: Approche Contrastive (The Semantax And Grammaticalization Of 'Do' In English: A Contrastive Study) |
title_fullStr |
Semantique Et Grammaticalisation De 'Do' En Anglais: Approche Contrastive (The Semantax And Grammaticalization Of 'Do' In English: A Contrastive Study) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Semantique Et Grammaticalisation De 'Do' En Anglais: Approche Contrastive (The Semantax And Grammaticalization Of 'Do' In English: A Contrastive Study) |
title_sort |
semantique et grammaticalisation de 'do' en anglais: approche contrastive (the semantax and grammaticalization of 'do' in english: a contrastive study) |
publisher |
Université Paris III - Sorbonne Nouvelle |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/71565 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leouejeangilbert semantiqueetgrammaticalisationdedoenanglaisapprochecontrastivethesemantaxandgrammaticalizationofdoinenglishacontrastivestudy |
_version_ |
1719347520347308032 |