PATIENT OUTCOMES AND MANAGED CARE: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE STATE REGULATORY BACKLASH?

Hundreds of state regulations were passed during the “managed care backlash” of the late 1990s and early 2000s. Many of these anti-managed care regulations eased or eliminated constraints on patient utilization of health care services imposed by managed care organizations. Other regulations gave man...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: HIGHFILL, TINA C
Format: Others
Published: VCU Scholars Compass 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4854
https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5856&context=etd
id ndltd-vcu.edu-oai-scholarscompass.vcu.edu-etd-5856
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-vcu.edu-oai-scholarscompass.vcu.edu-etd-58562019-10-20T22:08:00Z PATIENT OUTCOMES AND MANAGED CARE: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE STATE REGULATORY BACKLASH? HIGHFILL, TINA C Hundreds of state regulations were passed during the “managed care backlash” of the late 1990s and early 2000s. Many of these anti-managed care regulations eased or eliminated constraints on patient utilization of health care services imposed by managed care organizations. Other regulations gave managed care providers more flexibility in the way they practiced care or helped patients appeal denials of claims. Despite the effort undertaken to pass these regulations, limited research exists on whether the regulations achieved their goal. To fill this gap, this study takes advantage of the variety of regulations enacted during the managed care backlash of the late 1990s and early 2000s to investigate their impact on patient-reported quality of care and mortality for managed care enrollees. The results indicate the regulations did improve patient-reported outcomes, but to varying degrees and only in the latter period of the backlash. Specifically, managed care enrollees who lived in states that adopted moderate-intensity regulations between 2000 and 2004 reported relatively better improvements in access to care and confidence in their provider than did managed care enrollees in states with low-intensity backlash regulations. The positive effect on access to care was similar in states that adopted high-intensity regulations. However, no positive effect was found for any outcome in the first period (1996-2000). These results show that states with the most intense regulatory backlash did not realize better patient-reported outcomes. Instead, states that pursued moderate-intensity backlash regulations experienced relatively better outcomes for their managed care enrollees. 2017-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4854 https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5856&context=etd © Tina C Highfill Theses and Dissertations VCU Scholars Compass Managed care patient-reported outcomes state regulations satisfaction confidence access Health Law and Policy
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Managed care
patient-reported outcomes
state regulations
satisfaction
confidence
access
Health Law and Policy
spellingShingle Managed care
patient-reported outcomes
state regulations
satisfaction
confidence
access
Health Law and Policy
HIGHFILL, TINA C
PATIENT OUTCOMES AND MANAGED CARE: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE STATE REGULATORY BACKLASH?
description Hundreds of state regulations were passed during the “managed care backlash” of the late 1990s and early 2000s. Many of these anti-managed care regulations eased or eliminated constraints on patient utilization of health care services imposed by managed care organizations. Other regulations gave managed care providers more flexibility in the way they practiced care or helped patients appeal denials of claims. Despite the effort undertaken to pass these regulations, limited research exists on whether the regulations achieved their goal. To fill this gap, this study takes advantage of the variety of regulations enacted during the managed care backlash of the late 1990s and early 2000s to investigate their impact on patient-reported quality of care and mortality for managed care enrollees. The results indicate the regulations did improve patient-reported outcomes, but to varying degrees and only in the latter period of the backlash. Specifically, managed care enrollees who lived in states that adopted moderate-intensity regulations between 2000 and 2004 reported relatively better improvements in access to care and confidence in their provider than did managed care enrollees in states with low-intensity backlash regulations. The positive effect on access to care was similar in states that adopted high-intensity regulations. However, no positive effect was found for any outcome in the first period (1996-2000). These results show that states with the most intense regulatory backlash did not realize better patient-reported outcomes. Instead, states that pursued moderate-intensity backlash regulations experienced relatively better outcomes for their managed care enrollees.
author HIGHFILL, TINA C
author_facet HIGHFILL, TINA C
author_sort HIGHFILL, TINA C
title PATIENT OUTCOMES AND MANAGED CARE: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE STATE REGULATORY BACKLASH?
title_short PATIENT OUTCOMES AND MANAGED CARE: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE STATE REGULATORY BACKLASH?
title_full PATIENT OUTCOMES AND MANAGED CARE: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE STATE REGULATORY BACKLASH?
title_fullStr PATIENT OUTCOMES AND MANAGED CARE: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE STATE REGULATORY BACKLASH?
title_full_unstemmed PATIENT OUTCOMES AND MANAGED CARE: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE STATE REGULATORY BACKLASH?
title_sort patient outcomes and managed care: what was the impact of the state regulatory backlash?
publisher VCU Scholars Compass
publishDate 2017
url https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4854
https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5856&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT highfilltinac patientoutcomesandmanagedcarewhatwastheimpactofthestateregulatorybacklash
_version_ 1719272695470751744