Performance Comparison of Layered Composite Bimodal Fiber Mats with Unimodal Fiber Mats

The study was conducted to evaluate and compare performance of unimodal and bimodal mats with approximately same mass. 10% and 18% Nylon 4, 6 polymer solution were used for electrospinning the fibers. A negative ion source was used to neutralize the surface charge. The fiber diameters were measured...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kulkarni, Sukhada Sanjay
Format: Others
Published: VCU Scholars Compass 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/2567
http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3566&context=etd
id ndltd-vcu.edu-oai-scholarscompass.vcu.edu-etd-3566
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-vcu.edu-oai-scholarscompass.vcu.edu-etd-35662017-03-17T08:26:19Z Performance Comparison of Layered Composite Bimodal Fiber Mats with Unimodal Fiber Mats Kulkarni, Sukhada Sanjay The study was conducted to evaluate and compare performance of unimodal and bimodal mats with approximately same mass. 10% and 18% Nylon 4, 6 polymer solution were used for electrospinning the fibers. A negative ion source was used to neutralize the surface charge. The fiber diameters were measured with SEM and were <500 nm thus incorporating the slip effect. Bimodal mats were prepared from different deposition modes. Optimal mode was selected on analyzing the performance factors. The bimodal mats were then compared with unimodal mats. For their performance the fiber mass for these mats was approximately the same. It was observed that the unimodal mats had higher efficiencies and higher pressure drop giving a lower FOM. Bimodal mats showed lower efficiencies and pressure drop compared to unimodal mats. However, the FOM for bimodal mats was approximately 200% higher than unimodal mats 2011-07-28T07:00:00Z text application/pdf http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/2567 http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3566&amp;context=etd © The Author Theses and Dissertations VCU Scholars Compass Engineering
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Engineering
spellingShingle Engineering
Kulkarni, Sukhada Sanjay
Performance Comparison of Layered Composite Bimodal Fiber Mats with Unimodal Fiber Mats
description The study was conducted to evaluate and compare performance of unimodal and bimodal mats with approximately same mass. 10% and 18% Nylon 4, 6 polymer solution were used for electrospinning the fibers. A negative ion source was used to neutralize the surface charge. The fiber diameters were measured with SEM and were <500 nm thus incorporating the slip effect. Bimodal mats were prepared from different deposition modes. Optimal mode was selected on analyzing the performance factors. The bimodal mats were then compared with unimodal mats. For their performance the fiber mass for these mats was approximately the same. It was observed that the unimodal mats had higher efficiencies and higher pressure drop giving a lower FOM. Bimodal mats showed lower efficiencies and pressure drop compared to unimodal mats. However, the FOM for bimodal mats was approximately 200% higher than unimodal mats
author Kulkarni, Sukhada Sanjay
author_facet Kulkarni, Sukhada Sanjay
author_sort Kulkarni, Sukhada Sanjay
title Performance Comparison of Layered Composite Bimodal Fiber Mats with Unimodal Fiber Mats
title_short Performance Comparison of Layered Composite Bimodal Fiber Mats with Unimodal Fiber Mats
title_full Performance Comparison of Layered Composite Bimodal Fiber Mats with Unimodal Fiber Mats
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Layered Composite Bimodal Fiber Mats with Unimodal Fiber Mats
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Layered Composite Bimodal Fiber Mats with Unimodal Fiber Mats
title_sort performance comparison of layered composite bimodal fiber mats with unimodal fiber mats
publisher VCU Scholars Compass
publishDate 2011
url http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/2567
http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3566&amp;context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT kulkarnisukhadasanjay performancecomparisonoflayeredcompositebimodalfibermatswithunimodalfibermats
_version_ 1718427805979508736