William James's theory of personal identity.
In this thesis I examine William James's theory of personal identity. I argue that James's work is best viewed as an attempt to incorporate the fundamental insights of both the atomist and the holist traditions. James's ultimate commitment is to the unassailable nature of the basic fa...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
University of Ottawa (Canada)
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10393/4428 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-13852 |
id |
ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-4428 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-44282018-01-05T19:03:37Z William James's theory of personal identity. Anderson, Julie B. Forster, Paul, Philosophy. In this thesis I examine William James's theory of personal identity. I argue that James's work is best viewed as an attempt to incorporate the fundamental insights of both the atomist and the holist traditions. James's ultimate commitment is to the unassailable nature of the basic facts of consciousness. He rejects the theories offered by both Hume and Kant because of their inability to account for basic indubitable characteristics of thought. However, I also show how James's own theory of personal identity also runs its philosophical commitments over the facts of consciousness. My aim here is to show the dangers inherent in any attempt to provide philosophical mechanisms designed to explain the nature of selfhood. 2009-03-19T14:12:13Z 2009-03-19T14:12:13Z 1998 1998 Thesis Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 37-02, page: 0440. 9780612325241 http://hdl.handle.net/10393/4428 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-13852 73 p. University of Ottawa (Canada) |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Philosophy. |
spellingShingle |
Philosophy. Anderson, Julie B. William James's theory of personal identity. |
description |
In this thesis I examine William James's theory of personal identity. I argue that James's work is best viewed as an attempt to incorporate the fundamental insights of both the atomist and the holist traditions. James's ultimate commitment is to the unassailable nature of the basic facts of consciousness. He rejects the theories offered by both Hume and Kant because of their inability to account for basic indubitable characteristics of thought. However, I also show how James's own theory of personal identity also runs its philosophical commitments over the facts of consciousness. My aim here is to show the dangers inherent in any attempt to provide philosophical mechanisms designed to explain the nature of selfhood. |
author2 |
Forster, Paul, |
author_facet |
Forster, Paul, Anderson, Julie B. |
author |
Anderson, Julie B. |
author_sort |
Anderson, Julie B. |
title |
William James's theory of personal identity. |
title_short |
William James's theory of personal identity. |
title_full |
William James's theory of personal identity. |
title_fullStr |
William James's theory of personal identity. |
title_full_unstemmed |
William James's theory of personal identity. |
title_sort |
william james's theory of personal identity. |
publisher |
University of Ottawa (Canada) |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10393/4428 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-13852 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andersonjulieb williamjamesstheoryofpersonalidentity |
_version_ |
1718599243415945216 |