William James's theory of personal identity.

In this thesis I examine William James's theory of personal identity. I argue that James's work is best viewed as an attempt to incorporate the fundamental insights of both the atomist and the holist traditions. James's ultimate commitment is to the unassailable nature of the basic fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anderson, Julie B.
Other Authors: Forster, Paul
Format: Others
Published: University of Ottawa (Canada) 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10393/4428
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-13852
id ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-4428
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-44282018-01-05T19:03:37Z William James's theory of personal identity. Anderson, Julie B. Forster, Paul, Philosophy. In this thesis I examine William James's theory of personal identity. I argue that James's work is best viewed as an attempt to incorporate the fundamental insights of both the atomist and the holist traditions. James's ultimate commitment is to the unassailable nature of the basic facts of consciousness. He rejects the theories offered by both Hume and Kant because of their inability to account for basic indubitable characteristics of thought. However, I also show how James's own theory of personal identity also runs its philosophical commitments over the facts of consciousness. My aim here is to show the dangers inherent in any attempt to provide philosophical mechanisms designed to explain the nature of selfhood. 2009-03-19T14:12:13Z 2009-03-19T14:12:13Z 1998 1998 Thesis Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 37-02, page: 0440. 9780612325241 http://hdl.handle.net/10393/4428 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-13852 73 p. University of Ottawa (Canada)
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Philosophy.
spellingShingle Philosophy.
Anderson, Julie B.
William James's theory of personal identity.
description In this thesis I examine William James's theory of personal identity. I argue that James's work is best viewed as an attempt to incorporate the fundamental insights of both the atomist and the holist traditions. James's ultimate commitment is to the unassailable nature of the basic facts of consciousness. He rejects the theories offered by both Hume and Kant because of their inability to account for basic indubitable characteristics of thought. However, I also show how James's own theory of personal identity also runs its philosophical commitments over the facts of consciousness. My aim here is to show the dangers inherent in any attempt to provide philosophical mechanisms designed to explain the nature of selfhood.
author2 Forster, Paul,
author_facet Forster, Paul,
Anderson, Julie B.
author Anderson, Julie B.
author_sort Anderson, Julie B.
title William James's theory of personal identity.
title_short William James's theory of personal identity.
title_full William James's theory of personal identity.
title_fullStr William James's theory of personal identity.
title_full_unstemmed William James's theory of personal identity.
title_sort william james's theory of personal identity.
publisher University of Ottawa (Canada)
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10393/4428
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-13852
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonjulieb williamjamesstheoryofpersonalidentity
_version_ 1718599243415945216