Extracting Truths: State Regulation and the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise

Taking the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise (CORE) as its empirical focus, this study engages in a critical analysis of (capitalist) state regulation and corporate social responsibility as it relates to the Canadian extractive industry. Using a theoretical-analytical combination of M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnston, Kristine
Other Authors: Bittle, Steven
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10393/42602
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-26822
id ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-42602
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-426022021-11-03T05:29:50Z Extracting Truths: State Regulation and the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise Johnston, Kristine Bittle, Steven Corporate crime Corporate regulation Corporate social responsibility Taking the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise (CORE) as its empirical focus, this study engages in a critical analysis of (capitalist) state regulation and corporate social responsibility as it relates to the Canadian extractive industry. Using a theoretical-analytical combination of Marx’s ideology theory and critical discourse analysis, the study explores discourses pertaining to the introduction, creation, and role of the CORE – the Canadian state’s most recent response to corporate harms and crimes within the industry – to uncover the factors that shaped this process. Further informed by critical criminological literature on corporate crime, the study found that dominant neoliberal capitalist narratives prevailed in determinations of which regulatory approach should be adopted by the state. Dominant voices sidetracked counter-hegemonic claims in debates about human rights and international development by prioritizing the economy, leaning on Canada’s “good” global reputation, downplaying the violence of the industry, and redirecting blame. Ideological assumptions about the nature of state regulation, corporations, and capitalist law and politics further influenced which knowledge claims “won out.” Despite the emergence of the CORE as a logical state response to corporate crime and impunity, however, debates about its role are ongoing. This not only reinforces the idea that (capitalist) dominance is never absolute but signals the ever-present nature of resistance and possibility for change. 2021-08-30T19:25:46Z 2021-08-30T19:25:46Z 2021-08-30 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10393/42602 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-26822 en Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 application/pdf Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Corporate crime
Corporate regulation
Corporate social responsibility
spellingShingle Corporate crime
Corporate regulation
Corporate social responsibility
Johnston, Kristine
Extracting Truths: State Regulation and the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise
description Taking the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise (CORE) as its empirical focus, this study engages in a critical analysis of (capitalist) state regulation and corporate social responsibility as it relates to the Canadian extractive industry. Using a theoretical-analytical combination of Marx’s ideology theory and critical discourse analysis, the study explores discourses pertaining to the introduction, creation, and role of the CORE – the Canadian state’s most recent response to corporate harms and crimes within the industry – to uncover the factors that shaped this process. Further informed by critical criminological literature on corporate crime, the study found that dominant neoliberal capitalist narratives prevailed in determinations of which regulatory approach should be adopted by the state. Dominant voices sidetracked counter-hegemonic claims in debates about human rights and international development by prioritizing the economy, leaning on Canada’s “good” global reputation, downplaying the violence of the industry, and redirecting blame. Ideological assumptions about the nature of state regulation, corporations, and capitalist law and politics further influenced which knowledge claims “won out.” Despite the emergence of the CORE as a logical state response to corporate crime and impunity, however, debates about its role are ongoing. This not only reinforces the idea that (capitalist) dominance is never absolute but signals the ever-present nature of resistance and possibility for change.
author2 Bittle, Steven
author_facet Bittle, Steven
Johnston, Kristine
author Johnston, Kristine
author_sort Johnston, Kristine
title Extracting Truths: State Regulation and the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise
title_short Extracting Truths: State Regulation and the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise
title_full Extracting Truths: State Regulation and the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise
title_fullStr Extracting Truths: State Regulation and the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise
title_full_unstemmed Extracting Truths: State Regulation and the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise
title_sort extracting truths: state regulation and the canadian ombudsperson for responsible enterprise
publisher Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/10393/42602
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-26822
work_keys_str_mv AT johnstonkristine extractingtruthsstateregulationandthecanadianombudspersonforresponsibleenterprise
_version_ 1719492431692431360