Impacts of an Urbanization Gradient on Pollination Services to a Bee-Pollinated Plant
The vast majority of flowering plants rely on pollinators for outcrossed reproduction. Unfortunately, many species of pollinators are in decline. Pollinators face a number of challenges, including shifting land use, climate change and pesticides. In addition, pollinator habitat may be altered or el...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10393/38310 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-22563 |
| Summary: | The vast majority of flowering plants rely on pollinators for outcrossed reproduction. Unfortunately, many species of pollinators are in decline. Pollinators face a number of
challenges, including shifting land use, climate change and pesticides. In addition, pollinator habitat may be altered or eliminated through urbanization. Fragmented urban
landscapes may lengthen the distances among foraging patches, limit resources in a given patch, and reduce the availability of pollinator nesting sites. Here, I examine the effects of urbanization on pollination services by addressing the following questions: (1) Does bee species richness and/or abundance change along an urbanization gradient?; (2) Does the pollen limitation of a focal species vary along the same gradient?; (3) Do plants with a mixed mating system produce more selfed seeds in more urban environments? Using the percentage of impervious land cover in the space immediately surrounding the site as a proxy for site urbanization, 15 study sites were set up across the city of Ottawa to span a range from minimal percent impervious surface (mostly green space) to mostly impervious surface (little green space) at a range of spatial scales. At each site I set up an array of 20 potted Impatiens capensis plants as well as six pan traps in order to collect data on pollen limitation, seed production, and the number of selfed progeny, in addition to information about local pollinator species richness and abundance. Plants in the arrays were randomly assigned to either a hand or open pollination treatment in order to assess the level of pollen limitation. Surprisingly, pollinator species richness and abundance were not correlated with urbanization. Pollen limitation declined with urbanization, however, so did overall seed set, making it difficult to detangle the effects of resource limitation and hand pollination treatments. The number of selfed seeds produced by a plant was also significantly correlated with site urbanization. Further investigation is required to better understand the dynamics of pollination services in urban environments. I recommend that future studies explore how the presence of individual bee species in rural and urban habitats could be influencing pollen limitation and selfing in I. capensis. |
|---|